4361 | 3 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 03 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Mystic River
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884592.bfB380A74356.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Mystic River | |
Richard Jensen | |
From: "Richard Jensen"
To: Subject: Mystic River: one of the definitive pieces of screen acting NY TIMES October 3, 2003 MOVIE REVIEW | 'MYSTIC RIVER' Dark Parable of Violence Avenged By A. O. SCOTT At the beginning of Clint Eastwood's mighty "Mystic River," which will open the New York Film Festival tonight and be released nationwide on Wednesday, the camera drifts down from its aerial survey of Boston and alights in a nondescript blue-collar neighborhood of triple-decker wood-frame houses and scuffed-up sidewalks. A couple of dads sit on a back porch drinking beer and talking about the Red Sox, who are in the midst of their ill-starred 1975 season, while three boys - Dave Boyle, Jimmy Markum and Sean Devine - play hockey in the street below. The somber music (composed by Mr. Eastwood) and the shadows that flicker in the hard, washed-out New England light create an atmosphere of impending danger, which arrives soon enough as a dark sedan pulls up and then drives away with Dave in the back. Dave's abduction is an act of inexplicable, almost metaphysical evil, and this story of guilt, grief and vengeance grows out of it like a mass of dark weeds. At its starkest, the film, like the novel by Dennis Lehane on which it is based, is a parable of incurable trauma, in which violence begets more violence and the primal violation of innocence can never be set right. "Mystic River" is the rare American movie that aspires to - and achieves - the full weight and darkness of tragedy. Mr. Eastwood and his screenwriter, Brian Helgeland, have also been faithful to the sense of place that makes Mr. Lehane's book a superior piece of crime fiction. Much of the dialogue has been plucked directly from the pages of the book, and it retains the salty, fatalistic tang of the ungentrified streets of Irish-Catholic Boston. A quarter-century after the kidnapping, Dave, Sean and Jimmy have settled into ordinary adult lives of compromise and disappointment. Sean (Kevin Bacon) works in the homicide division of the Massachusetts State Police. His wife has left him but still calls him on his cellphone and remains silent while he stammers questions and half-hearted apologies. Jimmy (Sean Penn), whose first wife died while he was serving a prison sentence for robbery, has remarried; with visible effort, he has reinvented himself as a responsible citizen, running a small grocery store in his old neighborhood. Dave (Tim Robbins), who walks with the shuffling, stoop-shouldered gait of a timid, overgrown child, has a son of his own and a skittish, devoted wife named Celeste (Marcia Gay Harden). Celeste and Annabeth (Laura Linney), Jimmy's second wife, are cousins, and though "Mystic River" takes place in a modern American city, it is as thoroughly steeped in tribal codes of kinship, blood and honor as a Shakespeare play or a John Ford western. Everyone seems to be nursing a dark secret or an ulterior motive, and each emerges slowly into the light in the wake of a second senseless crime, the murder of Jimmy's 19-year-old daughter, Katie (Emmy Rossum). Because Katie's body was found in a park that lies within state jurisdiction, the case falls to Sean and his partner, Whitey Powers (Laurence Fishburne), and their investigation sets every sleeping dog in the neighborhood howling. Suspicion falls on Katie's boyfriend, Brendan Harris (Thomas Guiry), whose family is connected to Jimmy through an obscure underworld vendetta, and also on Dave, who saw Katie in a bar the night she was killed and who came home late with blood on his clothes. As with most murder mysteries, the densely woven narrative of "Mystic River" is a skein of coincidences and somewhat implausible connections. What gives the movie its extraordinary intensity of feeling is the way Mr. Eastwood grounds the conventions of pulp opera in an unvarnished, thickly inhabited reality. There are scenes that swell with almost unbearable feeling, and the director's ambitions are enormous, but the movie almost entirely avoids melodrama or grandiosity. Mr. Eastwood has found actors who can bear the weight and illuminate the abyss their characters inhabit. Mr. Penn, his eyes darting as if in anticipation of another blow, his shoulders tensed to return it, is almost beyond praise. Jimmy Markum is not only one of the best performances of the year, but also one of the definitive pieces of screen acting in the last half-century, the culmination of a realist tradition that began in the old Actor's Studio and begat Brando, Dean, Pacino and De Niro. But Mr. Penn, as gifted and disciplined as any of his precursors, makes them all look like, well, actors. He has purged his work of any trace of theatricality or showmanship while retaining all the directness and force that their applications of the Method brought into American movies. The clearest proof of his achievement may be that, as overpowering as his performance is, it never overshadows the rest of the cast. This tragedy, after all, is not individual but communal, even though each character must bear it alone. Mr. Bacon, even- keeled and self-effacing, is superb, as is Mr. Fishburne, whose humor and skepticism keep the movie from being swallowed up in gloom. Whitey (whose nickname has survived the racial transformation of his character from page to screen) is the only major character who is not implicated in the tribal history of the neighborhood, and his jokes and observations are reminders of the wider world. Mr. Robbins, in some ways, faces the greatest challenge, since he must play a man whose damaged personality is an unstable alloy of vulnerability and violence, naïveté and cunning. You want to feel sorry for him, but he also scares you. Which is the effect he has on Celeste, who provides the film's most haunting image of terror and heartbreak, just as Annabeth, emerging from the shadows near the end, articulates with frightening clarity the ruthlessness that passes, in this fallen world, for justice. The twists of plot that every good thriller needs are also, in this case, revelations of character. The jolts of surprise you feel when crucial bits of information are disclosed are nothing compared to the shock of seeing who people really are, and what they are capable of doing in the name of love, loyalty or self-preservation. When Sean realizes he must tell his old friend Jimmy that his beloved daughter is dead, he wonders what he should say: "God said you owed another marker, and he came to collect." This grim theology is as close as anyone comes to faith, but Mr. Eastwood's understanding of the universe, and of human nature, is if anything even more pessimistic. The evil of murderers and child molesters represents a fundamental imbalance in the order of things that neither the forces of law and order nor the impulse toward vengeance can rectify. Dave, looking back on his ordeal, describes himself as "the boy who escaped from wolves," and his flight is accompanied by noises that sound like the howls of wild animals. The actions of his abusers spring from some bestial, uncivilized impulse that cries out to be exterminated. The problem - the tragedy - is that grief, loyalty and even love spring from the same source. When Jimmy learns that he has lost the child who saved his life by forcing him into responsibility, he rages like a rabid beast, and you know his fury will only lead to more hurt. "We bury our sins, and wash them clean," he declares later on as he prepares to enact his vengeance, but this is wishful thinking, mere sentiment, and you suspect that Jimmy knows it. Mr. Eastwood surely does. "Mystic River" is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). It has profanity, abundant violence and existential despair. MYSTIC RIVER Directed by Clint Eastwood; written by Brian Helgeland, based on the novel by Dennis Lehane; director of photography, Tom Stern; edited by Joel Cox; music by Mr. Eastwood; production designer, Henry Bumstead; produced by Robert Lorenz, Judie G. Hoyt and Mr. Eastwood; released by Warner Brothers Pictures. Running time: 137 minutes. This film is rated R. Shown tonight at 8 at Alice Tully Hall and at 9 at Avery Fisher Hall, Lincoln Center, as part of the 41st New York Film Festival. WITH: Sean Penn (Jimmy Markum), Tim Robbins (Dave Boyle), Kevin Bacon (Sean Devine), Laurence Fishburne (Whitey Powers), Marcia Gay Harden (Celeste Boyle), Laura Linney (Annabeth Markum), Kevin Chapman (Val Savage), Thomas Guiry (Brendan Harris) and Emmy Rossum (Katie Markum). | |
TOP | |
4362 | 6 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 06 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D TOC Irish Studies Review, 11, 2, August 2003
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.0EF04366.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D TOC Irish Studies Review, 11, 2, August 2003 | |
Email Patrick O'Sullivan | |
From Email Patrick O'Sullivan
The latest Irish Studies Review was distributed to subscribers a month ago - and, of course, it also goes to all members of the British Association for Irish Studies. It has taken a while to get hold of the TOC - but here at last it is. The article by DIEGO TELLEZ ALARCIA takes as its starting point the portrait of Richard Wall acquired by the National Gallery, Dublin - and notes some errors in the Gallery's press statements. Joan Meyler reads Sterne's Tristram Shandy as an allegorical history of Ireland - er, convince me, someone... The name of LYNDA PRESCOTT will be familiar to longterm members of the Irish-Diaspora list - she was one of our original volunteer moderators, now removed from Bradford to The Open University. I fondly remember discussion of Jim Farrell's work by the photocopier - and here now is her study of Troubles. There is a sort of - not a law - but a tendency: when we have written about British Ireland we find a need to understand British India. So, Lynda shows here the foreshadowing in Troubles of The Siege of Krishnapur. GARY PEATLING offers a closely argued critique of David Lloyd's suggestion of connections between feminism and republicanism in Ireland. The review article is by Malcom Ballin, Cardiff, on Tom Clyde, Irish Literary Magazines. The Book Review section is, as ever, very strong - with many reviews of interest to the Ir-D list, and many of those reviews BY members of the Ir-D list. People, consider yourselves chased... Please share your book reviews with the rest of us... P.O'S. Irish Studies Review Publisher: Carfax Publishing Company, part of the Taylor & Francis Group Issue: Volume 11, Number 2 / August 2003 Richard Wall: Light and Shade of an Irish Minister in Spain (1694-1777) pp. 123 - 136 DIEGO TELLEZ ALARCIA The 'Body National' and the 'Body Natural': Tristram Shandy's History of Ireland pp. 137 - 154 JOAN MEYLER 'A Marginal Footnote': O'Faolain, the Subaltern, and the Travellers pp. 155 - - 164 PAUL DELANEY The Indian Connection in J. G. Farrell's Troubles pp. 165 - 173 LYNDA PRESCOTT Emotion and Excess: Discourses and Practices of Women and Republicanism in Twentieth-century Ireland pp. 175 - 187 GARY PEATLING At Home with Horror: Neil Jordan's Gothic Variations pp. 189 - 198 DESMOND O'RAWE REVIEW ARTICLE pp. 199 - 203 Reviews | |
TOP | |
4363 | 6 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 06 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Article, Father Mathew's Crusade
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.73C74361.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Article, Father Mathew's Crusade | |
Email Patrick O'Sullivan | |
From Email Patrick O'Sullivan
Forwarded for information... I have not been able to find an Abstract for this article. P.O'S. Addiction (Abingdon, England) Volume 98, Issue 6, June 2003, Pages 857-858 ISSN: 0965-2140 Father Mathew's Crusade: Temperance in Nineteenth-century Ireland and Irish America Savva, Susan; Edwards, Griffith [Journal Article; In English; England] | |
TOP | |
4364 | 6 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 06 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Article, 'Holy hatred', nationalism of John Mitchel
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.FbFed64362.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Article, 'Holy hatred', nationalism of John Mitchel | |
Email Patrick O'Sullivan | |
From Email Patrick O'Sullivan
Forwarded for information... Only recently fell into our nets... P.O'S. "Educate that holy hatred": place, trauma and identity in the Irish nationalism of John Mitchel G. Kearns Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK Available online 30 August 2001. Author Keywords: Nationalism; John Mitchel; Ireland; Irish Famine; Colonialism; Trauma Abstract Many anti-colonial nationalisms incorporate a historical justification for independence. In the case of Irish nationalism, this historical argument has often drawn attention to traumatic historical events of conquest and famine. These traumas are blamed on the English colonisers. In this article, I explore some of the consequences of this particular way of tying together place and history in the service of nationalism. I argue that it can serve to deflect nationalists from detailed consideration of alternative futures towards a purely manichean critique of the past. Political Geography Volume 20, Issue 7 , September 2001 , Pages 885-911 | |
TOP | |
4365 | 6 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 06 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Review, Walsh, Roman Catholic Nuns
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.7005D4360.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Review, Walsh, Roman Catholic Nuns | |
Email Patrick O'Sullivan | |
From Email Patrick O'Sullivan
Forwarded for information... P.O'S. Women's Studies International Forum Available online Not yet assigned to a printed issue Book review ROMAN CATHOLIC NUNS IN ENGLAND AND WALES 1800?1937, A SOCIAL HISTORY by Barbara Walsh, 248 pages, Irish Academic Press, Dublin and Portland, Oregon, 2002, UK£32.50 cloth Review by Jacinta Prunty Department of Modern History, National University of Ireland Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland Available online 3 October 2003. The foreword (by Maria Luddy) to this monograph makes a forceful case for the study of women religious. The lifestyle choice of thousands of women, these communities are deserving of study in their own right, for the social and economic impact they had on the wider (and not just Roman Catholic) community, and for the insights their rich and still under-used archives can provide for historians. The phrase `veiled dynamic' (Chapter 1) aptly conveys something of the essence of this landmark study. The opening challenge of this study is quantitative and geographical: establishing the number of convents, dates of opening, how many sisters in each, their location, relationship with other foundations, and the type of work(s) in which each engaged. What appears to be a straightforward though sizable task is complicated by the number of distinct communities, which share identical names and undertake similar works; the pre-existence of many communities as loose groups of women co-workers making dating `a foundation' problematic; the arrival of new groups from the continent which though sharing the same title and rule as the mother house were administered separately; the difficulties in categorising communities (as `active', `contemplatives', and `mixed'). Table 1 (Appendix II) is a chronological listing of the post-Reformation orders and congregations: location of return, first arrival or new foundation. This data is examined through a series of maps showing the distribution of RC convents in England and Wales 1857, 1897, and 1937, and closer examination of the distribution of convents in the Northern regions, and in London and the Southeast. This essential but time-consuming exercise throws open the entire research area: which communities established themselves and where in the direct aftermath of the 1829 Catholic Emancipation act? Why did so many communities establish themselves in London and the South East rather than in the Catholic North with which they are traditionally associated? Why were so many French communities attracted to England and to a lesser degree from Belgium and Germany? What works were undertaken and how did they finance and manage these? From where were these thousands of members drawn and what was the means used to recruit? These are some, but by no means all, of the questions, which Walsh undertakes to explore, and for the main part with considerable success. The backbone of Walsh's study is close analysis of the personnel and other records of a number of religious congregations (most importantly, the Sisters of St. Paul the Apostle, Birmingham; Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur, Liverpool; Sisters of Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary, Chigwell, Essex; and the Daughters of Charity of St. Vincent de Paul, Dublin). Through a combination of comparative and case-study work she quickly dispels some of the myths which have gathered around convents. In the study of recruitment, for example (Chapter 6), far from being the depository of `surplus daughters' beyond marriageable age, the convents under study all had rigorous weeding-out of unsuitable candidates (occasionally with wonderfully frank assessments), high levels of non-perseverance among new members, few departures after final profession, and an average age on entry of 23?24 years. The socioeconomic background of entrants is explored in great detail wherever the sources allow; the different backgrounds of Irish and English entrants, to the same communities, and their varying career prospects within the different congregations is a model of its type. Despite their undoubted importance to the history of social policy, education, health and welfare provision, and in the fields of feminist and gender studies, convents have been ignored or treated superficially (as argued throughout this text). Walsh's study will act as an encouragement to students and researchers to think afresh, as nuns do not easily `fit' with theories about women's submission in a patriarchal society. And as Walsh has shown, there is the need to understand the fraught ecclesiastical, political, social, and economic contexts in which women operated. One disappointment was the glossary (Appendix I), which purports to explain the terminology employed; this is superficial and has the effect of shaking the reader's confidence in the study to which it is appended. Describing postulants and novices together as `entrants who engaged in periods of training of about 2?3 years before taking their vows', for example, is simply not accurate. But in fairness, overall the work is produced to a high standard, the bibliography is invaluable, and the text should be required reading for students and researchers in the myriad fields in which women as nuns operated. | |
TOP | |
4366 | 6 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 06 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Luddy on FIELD DAY ANTHOLOGY
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.Ddd8d4363.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Luddy on FIELD DAY ANTHOLOGY | |
Email Patrick O'Sullivan | |
From Email Patrick O'Sullivan
Forwarded for information... P.O'S. Women's Studies International Forum Volume 26, Issue 4 , July-August 2003 , Pages 379-382 THE FIELD DAY ANTHOLOGY OF IRISH WRITING: VOLUMES FOUR AND FIVE: IRISH WOMEN'S WRITING AND TRADITIONS Cork University Press: Cork, New York University Press, New York, in association with Field Day 2002. 3200 pp. $250. £155. ISBN 185918281X Maria Luddy Department of History, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK Available online 30 July 2003. I have to begin by noting that this is not a review. Having been one of the editors of these volumes, it would be impossible for me to take an objective view of the work, but I will try to refrain from praising it too much. What I would really like to do here is to provide an account of how the volumes were constructed and give some indication of the range of material published. The history of the commissioning of these volumes is relatively straightforward. In 1991, under the editorship of Seamus Deane, The Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing was published. This three-volume work, totalling over 4000 pages, was a major intervention into Irish intellectual life and was much admired for its innovative structure. While the anthology provoked a variety of responses, some positive and some hostile, there was a particular outcry against the underrepresentation of women. By the early nineties in Ireland, there was a considerable awareness of women's place in Irish society, literature, and culture and, while research was still in its early stages, horror was expressed at the apparent lack of empathy for women's place in the construction of Irish culture and society evident in these original three volumes. In response to the criticism received Seamus Deane convened, in 1992, an editorial board of eight scholars to complete an additional volume on women's writing. Eleven years later, when one volume had stretched into two and taken up more than 3000 pages, the Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing, Volumes 4 and 5, Irish Women's Writing and Traditions appeared. There was a degree of hostility to the entire undertaking with a number of critics seeing an additional volume as a sop to feminists. Right from the beginning then, we were, as an editorial committee, constantly questioning what we were doing. Who might be considered an Irish author? What presence should the Irish language have in the anthology? What relationship was to exist between the new anthology and the original three volumes? We did not want our work to be a mere reaction to the original three volumes. We had also to question what we meant by an anthology. In his general introduction to volume I, Seamus Deane suggests that he is using the term `writing' to avoid the `narrow senses of the word "literature"' ([Deane, 1991], vol. 1: xix). Volumes 4 and 5 further broaden the category of writing. We redefined `writing' as `the way in which people use words ( [Bourke et al], vol. 4: xxxiii). Hence, these volumes contain the usual documents found in anthologies, extracts from novels, plays, poetry, letters, diaries, official documents, etc., but there is also a substantial selection of material from the oral tradition, including the song tradition and from the tradition of dinnseanchas, (`lore of important places'). It is unusual, if not unique, to find such a diversity of sources in any one anthology. We felt that in order to do justice to the ways in which women were represented in Irish society and the ways in which they expressed themselves the broadest range of material needed to be included. As Angela Bourke observes in the introduction to her section on `Oral Traditions', `not all important ideas are found in books' (vol. 4: 1191). Substantive matters relating to the structure and content of the anthology were discussed at numerous editorial meetings. There were long discussions, often heated, over many issues but most often compromises were made regarding the inclusion or exclusion of material. The quantity of material from which selections had to be made was daunting. The 8 editors were assisted by a group of 47 contributing editors. The editors all came from an academic background with expertise in history, the Irish language, folklore, and literature. The contributing editors were from a broader range of backgrounds and included journalists, novelists, poets, and political activists. Together and working collaboratively, we selected texts, wrote interpretative introductions and footnotes, and constructed the biographical and bibliographical details that ensure the authors of the texts used are no longer invisible. It is not surprising that the anthology took 11 years to produce since the construction of the entire anthology involved years of original research. Many texts were difficult to locate; weeks and months were spent in archival repositories searching for documents, months, and years were spent selecting, editing, and annotating. All Irish language material was translated and where a translation did not exist a new one had to be created. The anthology is divided into eight sections. These are, `Medieval to Modern, 600?1900' edited by Mairin Ni Dhonnchadha; `Religion, Science, Theology and Ethics, 1500?200' edited by Margaret MacCurtain; `Sexuality, 1685?2001' edited by Siobhan Kilfeather; `Oral Traditions' edited by Angela Bourke; `Politics, 1500?2000' edited by Mary O'Dowd; `Women in Irish Society, 1200?2000' edited by Maria Luddy; `Women and Writing, 1700?1960' edited by Gerardine Meaney; and the final section `Contemporary Writing, 1960?2001' edited by Clair Wills. The overall intention was always that the anthology would be interdisciplinary and would reflect the diverse nature of women's contribution to Irish history, culture and politics, and reveal the forces that shaped those contributions. The range of material used in the anthology is too vast to provide an adequate synopsis here of what is to be found in each section. Each section is further divided into subsections, which allowed the editors to manage the material, but the subsections also allow the reader a coherent way in which to approach the texts. The following are some examples of the subsections. The anthology begins in volume four with the section `Medieval to Modern, 600?1900' which explores, amongst other topics, early medieval law, Mary, Eve, and the Church (c.600?1800), natural and unnatural women. There is a subsection on Society and Myth ca. 700?1300, and further subsections on the visible world, sovereignty, warfare and death, the otherworld, courts and coteries, and Irish medical writings, 1400?1600. The editor comments in her introduction that while the section focuses mainly on medieval traditions it also addresses some of their consequences... the key period was between 650 and 850. The reservoir of myths, legends and dramatis personae established during this time was drawn on by storytellers and poets for over a millennium (vol. 4: 1). The significance of religion in the shaping of women's place in society is explored in the section on `Religion, Science, Theology and Ethics', which ranges from 1500 to 2000. Here, there are subsections on women and the religious reformation in early modern Ireland, the memoirs and testimonies of non-conformist women in 17th-century Ireland, 18th-century Catholic and Protestant women, the re-emergence of nuns and convents, hymns and hymn writers, women's recollections of Catholicism, and their understanding and expression of their religious convictions. Also included is a subsection on poetry of the spirit, faith and science, and theology and ethics. As Margaret MacCurtain has noted, some of the material in this section reveals women's publicly or privately expressed `reflections of what was significant or puzzling, or simply scandalous in their experience of religion' ([MacCurtain, 2002], 2). The section on `Sexuality, 1685?2001' examines amongst other subjects, sexual discourse in English before the act of union, sexual expression and genre, childbirth, infanticide, the erosion of heterosexual consensus in Ireland in the years between 1940?2001, and lesbian encounters where the contributing editor, Emma Donoghue, discovered that `at least two dozen Irish writers, from the late eighteenth century to the late twentieth century, have touched on lesbian themes in their work' (vol. 4: 1090). In the oral traditions section, we find subsections on life tales, international folktales, the storytelling traditions of Irish travellers, legends of the supernatural, the song tradition, spirituality, and religion in oral tradition. There is also a subsection on lamenting the dead where the editor discusses the tradition of laments and the art of the `caoineadh' (anglicised as "keen" or "keening"). The Irish `caoineadh' was chanted or sung and `was a central theatre of women's expression in the Irish language' (vol. 4: 1365). Volume 5 begins with the section on politics, 1500?200 and covers the political writings and public voices of women, ca. 1500?1850, women and politics in Ireland 1800?1968, the women's movement in the republic of Ireland, 1968?2000, the law and private life in the republic of Ireland. There are subsections also on the political activism of women in Northern Ireland from 1918 to 2000. In this section, the aim, as stated by the editor, is to present `texts which illustrate how women influenced the political process without holding office; secondly, it documents the movements for women's rights; and thirdly, it traces the interaction between the latter and the women who secured political office in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries' (vol. 5: 1). Considerable space in this section is also given to women in Northern Ireland where, especially from the 1960s, they were instrumental in organising campaigns, community projects and women's centres and as, Monica McWilliams writes, `[they] played a central role in the development of alternative political structures in Northern Ireland' (vol. 5: 34). My own section of the anthology focuses on `Women in Irish Society, 1200?2000'. It includes substantial surveys of women's place in the Irish economy from ca. 1170, and the education of girls and women from about 1500. It was important also to hear the voices of the women who had left Ireland as willing or unwilling emigrants throughout the centuries. There were women who followed their military husbands as they sought places in European armies in the seventeenth century. There is, for instance, a letter from an Irish woman to the Infanta Isabella of Spain dating from 1629 asking for a special licence to beg, an occupation engaged in by a number of Irish women to assist their families until rations or money were received by the soldier (vol. 5: 570). Exploring Irish women in other cultures also reveals difficulties in integration. An extract from Narratives of the Witchcraft Cases, 1648?1706 [Burr, 1959] recounts the story of an Irish woman accused of witchcraft at the start of the famous witch trials in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692. While the account suggests mental instability it also provides a glimpse of her use of the Irish language and her religious beliefs and an insight into her cultural and spiritual worlds. A number of subsections deal with women's experiences of institutions such as workhouses, hospitals, prisons and Magdalen asylums. From the research undertaken for this section, it is clear that women in Irish society were aware of the constraints placed upon them. They knew they had limited choices, but many were also aware that the expectations placed on them could be overcome, and that the boundaries placed around their behaviour were not totally rigid. The rules which governed society and women's place in it were often contradictory. Many Irish women tested these rules to their limits and found alternative ways of being. The section dealing with `Women and Writing, 1700?1960' focuses specifically on literary material and is informed by a feminist literary history perspective. It concentrates on the novel, poetry, short fiction, and drama and includes studies of the profession of letters, 1700?1810, women's narratives 1800?1840, women and literary nationalism, 20th-century Irish language memoirs, aesthetics and politics, and includes a subsection on women historians. In her introduction to the subsection `Identity and opposition: women's writing, 1890?1960', Gerardine Meaney notes, in a comment that could well be applied to much else in the anthology, that: Feminism, nationalism, modernism and modernisation are cross-currents that converge in all of the texts... All are concerned in some way with the politics of representation. They comprise, not the mainstream, nor a coherent sub-culture, but a disparate, complex and challenging cultural slipstream. Each asks the reader to read Irish writing in this period of transformation and stagnation from a new standpoint (vol. 5: 980). The final section of the anthology, and possibly the most difficult to construct, deals with contemporary writing. There are subsections on contemporary fiction, plays and poetry. As editor, Clair Wills, was also `concerned to move away from narrow genre-based definitions of Irish women's writing and to acknowledge the fluidity of forms currently favoured by women' [Irish Times, 2002], which include autobiography, confessional writing, historical writing, cultural commentary, and memoir. One of the subsections deals with `Politics and Sexuality in the Republic, 1965?2000' and highlights the `way women's journalistic writings feeds into other genres of creative writing'. Another subsection, `Women in the North of Ireland, 1969?2000', uses a range of writing that emphasises testimony and personal experience [Irish Times, 2002]. In total, there are over 1700 documents in this anthology featuring the work of more than 750 writers and covering 1400 years. The anthology makes available, for the first time, a comprehensive collection of texts covering almost every aspect of Irish women's lives. It is an indispensable tool for the student of Irish history and culture. It makes available forgotten or inaccessible texts. Its focus on women raises questions about the nature of Irish history, culture, and society. Its very existence marks the possibility of a more complex reading of Irish culture and history. The anthology is not meant to be the final word on women in Ireland, but it does attempt to offer possibilities for further research, debate, and discussion. In conclusion, I'd like to quote from the preface: In ranging so broadly across forms of writing, historical records and oral traditions, where the words of poets jostle with those of paupers and politicians, these volumes seek to do more than propose a new or extended canon of Irish writing, or a subaltern history for academics. Irish women are entitled to know about their history, culture and traditions. We offer this anthology to all our readers as a sampler of texts which are historically interesting, aesthetically accomplished and politically indispensable (vol. 1: xxxvi). References Burr, 1959. George Lincoln Burr, Narratives of the witchcraft cases, 1648?1706. , Barnes and Noble, New York (1959). Bourke et al., 2002. Bourke, Angela, et al. (Eds.) (2002). The field day anthology of Irish writing: Volumes four and five: Irish women's writing and traditions. Cork University Press: Cork, New York University Press, New York, in association with Field Day. Deane, 1991. Deane, Seamus (Ed.) (1991). The field day anthology of Irish writing. Field Day Publications: Derry/Faber: London. Irish Times, 2002. Irish Times (2002, 26 April). MacCurtain, 2002. Margaret MacCurtain, Women's writing and women's traditions: 3. Women and religion??The written and spoken word. British Association for Irish Studies Newsletter 32 (2002), pp. 1?4. Women's Studies International Forum Volume 26, Issue 4 , July-August 2003 , Pages 379-382 | |
TOP | |
4367 | 6 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 06 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Article, Identity among post-war migrants in Britain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.Dad554364.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Article, Identity among post-war migrants in Britain | |
Email Patrick O'Sullivan | |
From Email Patrick O'Sullivan
For information... P.O'S. Political Geography Available online - not yet assigned to a printed issue Workers, migrants, aliens or citizens? State constructions and discourses of identity among post-war European labour migrants in Britain Linda McDowell, Department of Geography, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, WC1H 0AP, London, UK Available online 19 September 2003. Abstract In this paper, I address a series of questions about migrant identities, assessing the continuities and contradictions between state discourses and those of migrants themselves. I address these questions through the lens of a largely neglected group of migrants, who were recruited by the British State in the immediately post-war period in response to post-war labour shortages. Whereas the recruitment of considerable numbers of labour migrants from the Caribbean to the United Kingdom from the late 1940s onwards is a well-documented part of the response to post-war labour shortages, earlier schemes to recruit people from refugee camps in Germany are less known. In this paper, I focus on women from Latvia, one of the Baltic states, who provide a particularly interesting insight into questions of identity as they both challenge common distinctions and assumptions in theories of migration--they came as independent single women for example. They are also a hybrid category in the sense they were both refugees and economic migrants with no previous attachments to the UK, unlike the other main groups of economic migrants at the time and earlier--Irish and Caribbean people--and the somewhat later migration from the Indian sub-continent. In this paper I show how these women challenged assumptions built into state policies at the time about assimilation and mothering future Britons through a strong and continuing commitment to the recreation of an imagined Latvian community in exile and the refusal of British identity. Author Keywords: EVWS (European Volunteer Workers); Latvia; Britain; Identity; Diaspora Article Outline 1. Introduction: diasporic and transnational identities 1.1. Why immigration? Post war labour shortages in the UK 2. State constructions of difference 2.1. Recruiting European volunteer workers 2.2. `Suitable' workers for the British labour market 3. Narratives of identity: British or alien? Workers or mothers? 3.1. Greater involvement with Britain and decisions about citizenship 3.2. Independence and the possibility of return 4. Conclusions Acknowledgements References | |
TOP | |
4368 | 6 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 06 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Article, Suicide, Irish migrants in Britain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.32bdF54365.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Article, Suicide, Irish migrants in Britain | |
Email Patrick O'Sullivan | |
From Email Patrick O'Sullivan
This article takes issue with Gerry Leavey's article, mentioned on the Ir-D list last year. We have discussed these issues here in Bradford - my own feeling is that the numbers are not that great and the individual-level analysis recommended by Peter Aspinall should really not be that difficult. P.O'S. The International Journal Of Social Psychiatry Volume 48, Issue 4 , December 2002 , Pages 290-304 ISSN: 0020-7640 Suicide amongst Irish migrants in Britain: a review of the identity and integration hypothesis Aspinall, Peter J Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent at Canterbury, Tunbridge Wells, UK; e-mail P.J.Aspinall[at]ukc.ac.uk Abstract BACKGROUND: Studies have consistently reported higher rates of suicide amongst Irish migrants in Britain than in the population as a whole. Leavey offers a hypothetical model to explain such rates that incorporates lack of social cohesion and integration meshed with the inability to establish an authentic identity and other contributory factors. MATERIAL: Systematic review methodologies are used to examine the central tenets of this explanatory framework. Some of the macro-level ecological associations in the model are critically evaluated in the context of findings from the 1991 Census and government social and household panel surveys. DISCUSSION: The evidence base suggests that statements on social isolation and reluctance to use health care services are questionable and Irish migration is shown to be much more heterogeneous than the model suggests. Only small positive, and as yet unreplicated, associations have been established between identity and health behaviour in a non-representative sample and evidence is lacking of Irish stoicism and anti-Irish racism as putative risk factors. Epidemiological studies show that adjusting suicide rates for social class explains virtually none of the excess in Irish migrants, although higher risks for unmarried persons are reported. Explanations in the literature for higher rates of migrant suicide are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Studies based on individual-level analysis and record linkage are urgently needed to explain the high rates. [Journal Article; In English; England] Citation Subset Indicators: Index Medicus MeSH Terms: Adolescent; Adult; Female; Great Britain, epidemiology (EP); Human; Ireland, ethnology (EH); Male; Middle Age; Social Identification; Social Isolation, psychology (PX); Suicide, * psychology (PX), * statistics & numerical data (SN); Transients and Migrants, * psychology (PX), * statistics & numerical data (SN) The International Journal Of Social Psychiatry Volume 48, Issue 4 , December 2002 , Pages 290-304 ISSN: 0020-7640 | |
TOP | |
4369 | 7 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 07 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D CFP Reminder, Imagining Diasporas
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.868B6724368.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D CFP Reminder, Imagining Diasporas | |
Email Patrick O'Sullivan | |
From Email Patrick O'Sullivan
Forwarded for information... P.O'S. - -----Original Message----- Subject: Reminder: Call for Papers - Imagining Diasporas Conference *The deadline for submitting proposals is October 15, 2003.* The Centre for Social Justice and the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Windsor are hosting a conference Imagining Diasporas: Space, Identity and Social Change May 14-16, 2004 University of Windsor Windsor, Ontario Canada Confirmed Speakers: Brian Keith Axel "Diasporic Sublime" Robin Cohen "The Uses of 'Diaspora'" Nina Glick-Schiller "Biologies of Belonging: Blood, Diasporic Longing, Long-Distance Nationalism, and the World Beyond" Michael Gomez "Dilemmas of Identity in Diaspora" Judith Sinanga Ohlmann "La diaspora rwandaise: où 'l'origine' perd son sens" William Safran "Diaspora: Disconnection, Hyphenation, Reconstruction" Individual and panel proposals are invited to address issues of broad theoretical interest, as well as case studies of individual diasporic communities. Paper and panel proposals may be sent to: Linda Feldman, Programme Chair Languages, Literatures and Cultures University of Windsor Windsor, ON N9B 3P4 Canada e-mail: feldman[at]uwindsor.ca For a conference description and a list of major themes please visit the conference web site at: http://www.uwindsor.ca/diasporas | |
TOP | |
4370 | 7 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 07 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Review, Mulvihill on FIELD DAY WOMEN
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.440784a4367.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Review, Mulvihill on FIELD DAY WOMEN | |
Email Patrick O'Sullivan | |
From Email Patrick O'Sullivan
Maureen E Mulvihill has kindly made available to the Irish-Diaspora list her review essay - text pasted in below - of The Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing: Irish Women's Writing and Traditions. This is a version of the review essay that appeared in the Summer 03 issue of Eighteenth-Century Studies. Our thanks to Maureen. P.O'S. - -----Original Message----- From: Maureen E Mulvihill mulvihill[at]nyc.rr.com Review Essay (plain-text version): FOURTEEN HUNDRED YEARS OF IRISH WOMEN WRITERS The Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing. Irish Women's Writing and Traditions. Eds. Angela Bourke, Siobhan Kilfeather, Maria Luddy, Margaret MacCurtain, Geraldine Meaney, Mairin Ni Dhonnchadha, Mary O'Dowd, and Clair Wills. Volumes IV and V. County Cork, Ireland: Cork UP, 2002. Volume IV, li + 1490 pp. Volume V, xlii + 1711 pp. US distributor, New York University Press. Two-volume set, $250 (cloth). ISBN 0-8147-9908-6. To the memory of Mitzi Myers. And for Gerda Lerner, mother of feminist historiography By Maureen E. Mulvihill, Princeton Research Forum, N.J. Eighteenth-Century Studies (Summer, 2003, pp 607-610) Faugh a ballagh! Clear the way for Irishwomen writers. In giving over the editorial reins of The Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing in 1991 to a capable team of eight Irishwomen scholars, Seamus Deane and his editorial associates, Andrew Carpenter and Jonathan Williams, have done something truly important for Irish studies. Students, teachers, scholars, librarians, antiquarian specialists, and generalists now have in two hefty (yea, biblical) volumes of 3200 pages a reliable first canon of the indigenous writings and traditions of Ireland's women, circa 600 to 2001. The voices of some 900 Irishwomen are heard in these pages. Moreover, the volumes' eight editors and forty-nine contributing editors have organized the books into eight large thematic sections, whose contents are richly interdisciplinary. (Why even an Irishman knows better than to bicker with this.) Field Day IV and V are not compendia of merely poetry and ancient lore; one finds here collations of writings which effectively critique the complex issues that led to the clangor of Ireland's bloody history-issues relating to politics, institutions, and Anglo-Irish relations. Volume IV offers thematic groupings on Sovereignty and Politics, Courts and Coteries, Nonconformist Women, Sexual Expression and Genres, the Erosion of the Heterosexual Consensus, and (an especially outstanding section) Religion, Science, Theology and Ethics, 1500-2000, edited by Margaret MacCurtain. Volume V gathers selections under such headings as Political Writings, circa 1500-1850; Women and the Economy, circa 1170-1850; Women and Emigration from Ireland from the Seventeenth Century; Education in Ireland before 1800; and Women's Writing, 1700-1900. Because of the editors' skillful organization of a massive amount of material, readers can appreciate the origins and persistence of certain subjects, genres, and traditions in Irish writing and culture, as well as their changing characteristics over many turbulent centuries, an astounding feat by any standard. Prior to this big publishing event, scholars of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Irish women writers were limited to original source-materials represented in three large information venues. First in the print medium, there were such earlier anthologies as Pillars of the House: An Anthology of Verse by Irish Women from 1680 to the Present, edited by Angeline Agnes Kelley (Dublin: Attic Press, 1988; rpt., Dublin: Wolfhound/Merlin Publishing, 1998); Ireland's Women: Past and Present, edited by Katie Donovan, A. Norman Jeffares, and Brendan Kennelly (New York and London: Norton, 1994); Verse in English from Eighteenth-Century Ireland, edited by Andrew Carpenter (Cork University Press, 1998); and, for the predictable, canonical figures, the three-volume Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing (Derry, No. Ireland: Field Day Publications, 1991; New York: W. W. Norton, 1991). Also in the print medium were two successful reference works which supplied essential "thumbnails" on the more familiar Irishwomen writers, namely, Robert Hogan's Dictionary of Irish Literature (Greenwood Press, 1979; 2d ed., 1996) and the second edition of An Encyclopedia of British Women Writers, edited by Paul and June Schlueter (Rutgers University Press, 1998). In the electronic medium, scholars could access "data sets" of the primary writings in EIRData, a mighty omnigatherum compiled and managed by Bruce Stewart (University of Ulster, County Coleraine, Derry, Northern Ireland), Director of the Princess Grace Irish Library of Monaco. But only now in the opening years of the new millennium do we have all of these essential writings brought together in only two volumes. Let us consider what this very Irish team of editorial scholars has wrought. The principal strength of Field Day IV and V is its staggering coverage. The editors have assembled a thoughtful thematic organization of 1400 years of writing, whose selections are culled from multiple genres: poetry, fiction, memoir, political pamphlet, ballad and song, letter, testimonial, journalism, folklore, children's literature, and work originally in the oral tradition. Irish language specialists will thrill to see in Volume IV a number of selections presented in the original Irish, with translation. The English-language selections, which account for most of the selections, are given reader-friendly (mostly modern spelling) formats; and all of the selections are presented within discrete thematic clusters, each of which is accompanied by a useful scholarly apparatus consisting of an extended introductory essay, textual headnote and footnotes, author biographies, and bibliographies. A reliable general index per volume assures convenient access of information. The section on early-modern Irishwomen's political writings (some 25 writers), edited by Mary O'Dowd, will be especially attractive to readers of this journal. O'Dowd's cluster shows Irishwomen's response to social and cultural injustices, crises, risings, and atrocities, circa 1500-1850. Speaking truth to power, élite Irishwomen and those agitating at the populist level wrote petitions, political pamphlets, bold letters to public officials, and explicit polemical works. Among this important section are Elizabeth Butler's letter to Oliver Cromwell, notices of political meetings convened by Quaker women, a radical pamphlet by Irishwomen in Munster and Leinster precipitated by the Money Bill Dispute in the Irish Parliament (1753), and letters between Irishwomen on specific political situations, such as Mary Delany's letter to Anne Granville (1731). All of these selections, individually headnoted and annotated by O'Dowd, document the temper of the times from a female perspective. They also supply a range of political rhetorics and styles used by women of varying social strata and political beliefs. Two other sections merit special praise. "Women's Writing, 1700-1960," edited by Gerardine Meaney, gathers work under such headings as "The Profession of Letters" (publishing women writers, such as Mary Davys, Sarah Butler, Mary Monck, Mary Barber, Constantia Grierson, Laetitia Pilkington, Frances Sheridan, Charlotte Brooke, et al) and "Women's Narratives" (Sidney Owenson, Mary Leadbeater, Marguerite Power, Lady Clarke, et al). Another strong section is Siobhán Kilfeather's interrogation of Irish constructions of sexuality (1685-2001), traditionally a taboo subject for most early-modern Irish writers. Over a variety of genres-ballads, letters, memoirs, essays, sketches-she offers a feast of Irish writing which shows that sexuality was largely a social and institutional construct. Extracts here explore such subjects as rape, premarital sex, adultery, sexual desire, and transgressive behaviors. Kilfeather's introductory essay to the subsection, "Sexual Discourse in English before the Act of Union: Prescriptions and Dissent, 1685-1801" (Volume IV: 761-765), should be essential reading for all serious students of early-modern Irish cultural history. It will not detract from the great achievement of these volumes to offer but a few critical remarks. The first concerns format. In view of the volumes' size and, thus, price, Field Day IV and V is an expensive product ($250), destined mostly for library reference shelves. The volumes' print run was 1500 copies (800 copies, U.S. distribution). Sales have been brisk, thus far, according to Heather McManus and Eric Zinner at New York University Press (the volumes' U.S. distributor). But there is some preliminary chat about future alternate formats for the volumes, such as a series of abridged paperbacks, perhaps, or CD-ROMs. Digital conversion of the material would be especially strategic as it would allow the editors to provide something conspicuously wanting in the current print treatment: visual adjuncts to the writings. A few musical examples delightfully punctuate the print density of "The Song Tradition" section in Volume IV: 1312-1364, but surely some facsimiles of title-pages and autograph manuscripts, displayed throughout the volumes, as well as, say, a frontispiece portrait in each volume, would not have been terribly expensive additions. Such illustrated matter would have lent color and vigor to the volumes, not to mention authenticity. A multimedia CD-ROM format also could include audio clips for "The Song Tradition" section, as well as aural portraits (i.e., author readings) for the modern literature sections. As for the critical assessment of the writings in Field Day IV and V, it is too early to determine to what extent this large body of newly gathered work touched the nerve and marrow of a whole nation; but surely these volumes supply new paradigms and new Irish texts for historians and feminists. They also show us what Irishwomen can do when they set their minds to it. _________________ Maureen E. Mulvihill, editor of Poems by Ephelia (NY, 1992, '93) and Ephelia (Mary Villiers Stuart, Duchess of Richmond & Lennox) (2003, Ashgate UK), has published broadly on early-modern English and Irish women writers. Her recent credits in Irish studies include essays on the Dublin patriot printer & political journalist, James Esdall (New DNB, 2004); extended profiles, with apparatus, of Mary Tighe, Eibhlín Ní Chonaill, & Mary Leadbeater (Encyclopedia of British Women Writers, 2d ed., 1998); the Dublin book trade, Swift, Sheridan, & Oscar Wilde (recent issues, Irish Literary Supplement); and Trisha Ziff's 'Bloody Sunday' photo exhibition (New Hibernia Review, December, 2002; html text, Project Muse site). For MLA 2002, NYC, she convened a panel on Irishwomen writing politically. Her double-review essay of Helen Burke's Riotous Performances: The Struggle for Hegemony in the Irish Theatre, 1712-1784 (Notre Dame UP, 2003) and Irish Drama of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries edited by Christopher Wheatley & Kevin Donovan, 2 vols (Ganesha/Thoemmes UK 2003), will appear in the Spring, 2004 issue of Restoration & Eighteenth-Century Theatre Research. Her review of Raymond Gillespie's Scholar Bishop: The Recollections and Diary of Narcissus Marsh (Cork UP, 2003), will appear in the Winter-Spring 04 issue of Seventeenth-Century Stds. She is at work on Mary Tighe of County Wicklow, Ireland, the subject of her upcoming paper at the annual conference of the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Stds (Boston, March, 2004; Kevin O'Neill's Irish panel). __________________ | |
TOP | |
4371 | 7 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 07 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Article, Social variation and Irish diet
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.054a4369.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Article, Social variation and Irish diet | |
Email Patrick O'Sullivan | |
From Email Patrick O'Sullivan
Forwarded for information... P.O'S. The Proceedings Of The Nutrition Society Volume 61, Issue 4, November 2002, Pages 527-536 ISSN: 0029-6651 Effect of social variation on the Irish diet Kelleher, Cecily; Friel, Sharon; Nolan, Geraldine; Forbes, Betty National Nutrition Surveillance Centre, Department of Health Promotion, Clinical Sciences Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Costello Road, Shantalla, Galway City, Republic of Ireland; e-mail cecily.kelleher[at]nuigalway.ie Abstract Both jurisdictions of Ireland have high rates of chronic degenerative diseases, particularly of the cardiovascular system, and Irish migrants have worse health profiles, often lasting at least two generations. The influence of socio-demographic variation over the life course, and what role diet plays, has not been well researched in epidemiological terms. There is a long history of an unusual Irish diet. Estimated dietary fat intake (% total energy intake) in 1863 was only 9, but had reached 30 in 1948 and 34 in 1999. Conversely, carbohydrate intake has fallen steadily over 150 years. From 1948 onwards household budget survey data illustrate patterns of increasing urbanisation and socio-economic gradients in food availability. The National Survey of Lifestyles, Attitudes and Nutrition, (n 6539, 62.2% response rate) provides clear evidence of inverse social-class gradients in intake of fruit and vegetables and dairy products and in reported patterns of healthy eating. Median carbohydrate and vitamin C levels are higher among social classes 1-2 and mean saturated fat intake is lower. International comparisons indicate a continuing, if narrowing, north-south gradient across Europe. Data from the Boston-Ireland study suggest a crossover in both dietary intake patterns and risk of heart disease in Ireland and the USA in the 1970s. Contemporary comparative data of middle-aged Irish and American women demonstrate patterns of diet intake and inactivity consistent with the modern epidemic of obesity and non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Thus, dietary variations within and between countries and over time are consistent with chronic disease patterns in contemporary Ireland. [Journal Article; In English; England] CAS Registry Numbers: Dietary Carbohydrates; Dietary Fats Citation Subset Indicators: Index Medicus MeSH Terms: Attitude to Health; Cardiovascular Diseases, epidemiology (EP); Culture; * Diet; Dietary Carbohydrates, administration & dosage (AD); Dietary Fats, administration & dosage (AD); Energy Intake; Female; Health Promotion; Human; Ireland, epidemiology (EP), ethnology (EH); Life Style; Middle Age; Nutrition; Nutrition Policy; * Social Behavior; * Social Class; Socioeconomic Factors; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.; United States The Proceedings Of The Nutrition Society Volume 61, Issue 4 , November 2002 , Pages 527-536 ISSN: 0029-6651 | |
TOP | |
4372 | 7 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 07 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D In memory of Mitzi Myers
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.EA0a4370.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D In memory of Mitzi Myers | |
Kerby Miller | |
From: Kerby Miller
Subject: Re: Ir-D Review, Mulvihill on FIELD DAY WOMEN I was shocked and saddened to read "in memory of Mitzi Myers," at the beginning of Maureen Mulvihill's essay, because she and I had worked on the EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY LIFE issue devoted to the United Irishmen, and we had spoken often by phone. Can Maureen or someone tell me what happened? Thank you, Kerby. | |
TOP | |
4373 | 8 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 08 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.cD88B2E64376.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny 3 | |
Peter Hart | |
From: Peter Hart
Subject: Re: Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny 2 Although, as I think Sean Connolly and perhaps Tom Bartlett have argued, race was never an issue in the Penal Laws - just religion. Converts could easily cross the legal barrier - an option unavailable to those discriminated against under apartheid or jim crow. Peter Hart > >From: "Nieciecki, Daniel" >To: "'irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk'" >Subject: RE: Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny > >I wasn't aware that the Statutes of Kilkenny were intended to be a >racially-based system of segregation. They were directed at the >Anglo-Norman nobility in Ireland--not the native Irish--and their >intent seems to have been to force such Anglo-Norman feudal lords to >behave and present themselves as Anglo-Norman feudal lords. The >statues, then, seem to have been based more on class and culture rather >than race, and it also doesn't seem like "race" as a concept entered >into the equation until the explorations of Africa and the Americas got under way. > >The so-called "Penal laws"--which were not designed to destroy Irish >Catholicism itself, but to deprive the surviving Catholic nobility of >any access to political power and to gradually eliminate them as an >economic factor as well--would seem to be a much more workable parallel to apartheid. >Since these came into effect in the 1690's-1700's, it would seem that >race would be a much more relevant issue then that it would have been >in the mid-14th century. > >Daniel Nieciecki > | |
TOP | |
4374 | 8 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 08 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny 5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.Aa5fa24f4377.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny 5 | |
patrick maume | |
From: patrick maume
Sender: P.Maume[at]Queens-Belfast.AC.UK To: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk Subject: Re: Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny 4 From: Patrick Maume Isn't there a basic difference between the Statutes of Kilkenny and apartheid? People have some control over their customs and ways of living (and even more over their religious profession, if the comparison is made with the Penal Laws); they usually can't change their skin colour, and most can't "pass". If every form of prejudice and discrimination is called "apartheid" the term loses its meaning. There's something older than the Statutes of Kilkenny that is much more disturbing; the idea that the "wild Irish" were outside the king's law and that therefore killing them was not murder. I believe this was actually used as a defence in some mediaeval murder trials (not always successfully, since some of the Gaelic Irish were regarded as the king's subjects and the murderers couldn't always distinguish between the two). Did this last until Henry VIII declared himself King of Ireland, or had it gone before then? Surely the Penal Laws were indeed intended to abolish Catholicism, on the assumption that if the Catholic lay elite disappeared and no more priests were ordained, the plebs would gradually be protestantised? (Cf. CDA Leighton's book CATHOLICS INA PROTESTANT KINGDOM). Their implementation was another matter; there were quite a few instances of Protestant zealots complaining that most of the Ascendancy took no interest in converting Catholics because if everyone became Protestant they would lose their claim to superiority. Best wishes, Patrick > From: Carmel McCaffrey > Subject: Re: Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny 2 > > Yes, that is true they were directed at the Anglo-Normans or > Gaelo-Normans as they had become by then, but they effectively tried > to separate the two from each other, which is what they were intended > to do, or to keep the Norman line 'pure'. The idea that they were an > early attempt at segregation is not new and I even heard it in my > Dublin secondary school years ago. The word "apartheid" is actually > used by J.F. Lyndon [formerly of medieval history, Trinity, Dublin] in > his essay which is what contributed to my discussion with the > students. So I just wondered if this had been taken further by anyone > else. I think it is an interesting concept in the light of Ireland > being the front line of empire building. Of course there was no > developed idea of race this early on, but the concept of "them" and > "us" , the victor and the vanquished, the ascendancy of the culture of > the winners, would certainly have been. Even Giraldus gave us plenty > of that. Of course the statutes were ineffective, but that is not the > point, the interesting thing is the conception of these laws so early > in the Irish colonial experience. I just think it is an interesting > idea that they perhaps were an early taste of race or ethnic conflict in later empire building and an indication of a certain way of thinking. > > Carmel | |
TOP | |
4375 | 8 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 08 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D THE OSCHOLARS III/10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.d831Ad4372.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D THE OSCHOLARS III/10 | |
David Rose | |
From David Rose
Subject: THE OSCHOLARS III/10 Dear Colleagues, chers et chères collègues, Liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen, Geachte collega's en collegae, Cari colleghi e colleghe, Drodzy Koledzy i KolezË?anki, Queridos colegas: [Kindly note that this is being sent once more on a computer not my own: I can be contacted at oscholars[at]netscape.net] We are happy to announce, albeit once again tardily, the posting of the twenty-ninth edition of THE OSCHOLARS to its website at http//homepages.gold.ac.uk/oscholars; the password remaining umney As a registered reader you can bypass the portal by going straight to http//homepages.gold.ac.uk/oscholars/homepage.html We much regret that the rather adverse circumstances under which the September issue was composed resulted in an untoward number of errors and omissions. This issue has been reposted to the website, and we apologise for any confusion caused. We are continuing to have a number of these encyclicals bounced. Often this is no more than a full mailbox, but an increasing number of institutions are introducing anti Spam programmes which seem to filter us out. Do please check this from time to time; and do remember to alert us to changes of e-address. Our own life continues peripatetic, and we fear that delays will continue with THE OSCHOLARS until we are once again in possession of a desk, a telephone line, an internet connection, and our iMac. The purchase of a somewhat antiquated laptop has helped. The October issue is not altogether satisfactory, as we have not been able to give it all our attention, having been largely on the move and with restricted internet access. But our commitment (and that of The Rose Garden) remains, and we are pleased that we have failed to alienate any of our readership, which continues to grow. We dearly need more reviewers, though, especially of productions. This month we review Diana Holmes: Rachilde, Decadence, Gender and the Woman Writer (Jane Desmarais); Salome in Sydney (Julie-Ann Robson); Herodias in Vienna (Margaret de Fonblanque); The Tulira Trilogy of Edward Martyn (1859-1923), Irish Symbolist Dramatist, edited, with Introduction, by Jerry Nolan (Mary C. King); Kenneth Daley: The Rescue of Romanticism: Walter Pater and John Ruskin (Maureen Moran); A Florentine Tragedy in Paris (Danielle Guérin, Tine Englebert); and The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (Eva Thienpont). As mentioned in our previous encyclical, I shall be in the United States for a week, 17th to 26th November, based in New York. To those of you who are celebrating Columbus Day, German Unity Day, the Chung Yeung Festival, Yom Kippur, Ramadan or Ochi Day, our best wishes. David Rose | |
TOP | |
4376 | 8 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 08 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.7d004373.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny | |
Carmel McCaffrey | |
From: Carmel McCaffrey
Subject: Statutes of Kilkenny I have a question for the list. Is there anyone out there teaching Irish history in the former Empire - or anywhere else for that matter - who knows of any work done on the Statutes of Kilkenny [1366] as precursors to other colonial experiences? I started a discussion with my students in this area and many of them - some African-Americans - became interested in the notion that I set forth that they were the embryonic seeds of apartheid. Of course the English conquest of Ireland was the practice field of later imperialist behaviour but I am interested in specific work on the Statutes as such. That they were unenforceable within Ireland is not the issue - the issue is the thinking that lay behind such an effort. Thanks, Carmel McC | |
TOP | |
4377 | 8 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 08 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny 2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.DAfD4a4374.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny 2 | |
Nieciecki, Daniel | |
From: "Nieciecki, Daniel"
To: "'irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk'" Subject: RE: Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny I wasn't aware that the Statutes of Kilkenny were intended to be a racially-based system of segregation. They were directed at the Anglo-Norman nobility in Ireland--not the native Irish--and their intent seems to have been to force such Anglo-Norman feudal lords to behave and present themselves as Anglo-Norman feudal lords. The statues, then, seem to have been based more on class and culture rather than race, and it also doesn't seem like "race" as a concept entered into the equation until the explorations of Africa and the Americas got under way. The so-called "Penal laws"--which were not designed to destroy Irish Catholicism itself, but to deprive the surviving Catholic nobility of any access to political power and to gradually eliminate them as an economic factor as well--would seem to be a much more workable parallel to apartheid. Since these came into effect in the 1690's-1700's, it would seem that race would be a much more relevant issue then that it would have been in the mid-14th century. Daniel Nieciecki > -----Original Message----- > > From: Carmel McCaffrey > Subject: Statutes of Kilkenny > > I have a question for the list. Is there anyone out there teaching > Irish history in the former Empire - or anywhere else for that matter > - who knows of any work done on the Statutes of Kilkenny [1366] as > precursors to other colonial experiences? I started a discussion with > my students in this area and many of them - some African-Americans - > became interested in the notion that I set forth that they were the > embryonic seeds of apartheid. Of course the English conquest of > Ireland was the practice field of later imperialist behaviour but I am > interested in specific work on the Statutes as such. > That they were unenforceable within Ireland is not the issue - the > issue is the thinking that lay behind such an effort. > > Thanks, > > Carmel McC | |
TOP | |
4378 | 8 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 08 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny 4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.7Ad6d4375.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny 4 | |
Carmel McCaffrey | |
From: Carmel McCaffrey
Subject: Re: Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny 2 Yes, that is true they were directed at the Anglo-Normans or Gaelo-Normans as they had become by then, but they effectively tried to separate the two from each other, which is what they were intended to do, or to keep the Norman line 'pure'. The idea that they were an early attempt at segregation is not new and I even heard it in my Dublin secondary school years ago. The word "apartheid" is actually used by J.F. Lyndon [formerly of medieval history, Trinity, Dublin] in his essay which is what contributed to my discussion with the students. So I just wondered if this had been taken further by anyone else. I think it is an interesting concept in the light of Ireland being the front line of empire building. Of course there was no developed idea of race this early on, but the concept of "them" and "us" , the victor and the vanquished, the ascendancy of the culture of the winners, would certainly have been. Even Giraldus gave us plenty of that. Of course the statutes were ineffective, but that is not the point, the interesting thing is the conception of these laws so early in the Irish colonial experience. I just think it is an interesting idea that they perhaps were an early taste of race or ethnic conflict in later empire building and an indication of a certain way of thinking. Carmel irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk wrote: >From: "Nieciecki, Daniel" >To: "'irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk'" >Subject: RE: Ir-D Statutes of Kilkenny > >I wasn't aware that the Statutes of Kilkenny were intended to be a >racially-based system of segregation. They were directed at the >Anglo-Norman nobility in Ireland--not the native Irish--and their >intent seems to have been to force such Anglo-Norman feudal lords to >behave and present themselves as Anglo-Norman feudal lords. The >statues, then, seem to have been based more on class and culture rather >than race, and it also doesn't seem like "race" as a concept entered >into the equation until the explorations of Africa and the Americas got under way. > >The so-called "Penal laws"--which were not designed to destroy Irish >Catholicism itself, but to deprive the surviving Catholic nobility of >any access to political power and to gradually eliminate them as an >economic factor as well--would seem to be a much more workable parallel to apartheid. >Since these came into effect in the 1690's-1700's, it would seem that >race would be a much more relevant issue then that it would have been >in the mid-14th century. > >Daniel Nieciecki > | |
TOP | |
4379 | 8 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 08 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D In memory of Mitzi Myers 2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.50ae1bAD4371.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D In memory of Mitzi Myers 2 | |
Maureen E Mulvihill | |
From: "Maureen E Mulvihill"
Subject: Submission, for Irish Diaspora List posting (Mitzi Myers, R.I.P.) 7 October 2003. Re: Professor Mitzi Myers, UCLA Requiescat in Pace In prompt & sad reply to Professor Kerby Miller's recent query re the recent death of Professor Mitzi Myers: As I understand the situation, Mitzi died of pneumonia, aged 62, resulting from lung injuries and burns incurred during a fire in her house, August, 2000. True to a scholar's heart, she went back into the flames to retrieve a book MS she was preparing for submission. I first heard these details from Simon Varey (PhD, Cambridge University), an editor of The Scriblerian journal, who himself died recently, and also in his prime, of a pernicious form of melanoma. Simon & Mitzi had both taught at UCLA; he had fond memories of Mitzi (so he wrote me), in her big '60's hats. The American Society for Eighteenth-Century Stds published, in a recent newsletter, one of many collegial appreciations of Mitzi. If you contact Vickie Cutting at the ASECS Office (see website), she's sure to send you an email copy of that piece. Also see John Issitt's detailed appreciation, at http://w4.ed.uiuc.edu/faculty/westbury/Paradigm/MYERS.HTM. Mitzi published a fine essay of special interest to subscribers of the Irish Diaspora list, "Gendering the 'Union of Hearts': Irish Politics between the Public and Private Spheres," Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, 30 (Johns Hopkins UP, 2001), 49-70. (Kerby, if your library does not carry this book series, let me know; I'll be glad to send on a fax or xerox copy. I have it here, before me.) Reflecting upon these recent tragedies makes us count our blessings, certainly; but we also must regret the loss of such talent and affection in the scholarly community. Both Mitzi Myers and Simon Varey achieved high credits in scholarly work, with strong promise of more to come. (I am grateful to you, Kerby Miller, for this opportunity to do but a small thing for their memory here.) Maureen E. Mulvihill Princeton Research Forum, New Jersey mulvihill[at]nyc.rr.com "Relentless caper, for all those who step the legend of their youth into the noon." Hart Crane, Legend (White Buildings, 1926) Set by Mel Powell (Events, 1963) _______ | |
TOP | |
4380 | 9 October 2003 05:59 |
Date: 09 October 2003 05:59
Reply-To: irish-diaspora[at]bradford.ac.uk
Sender:
From: irish-diaspora[at]Bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Ir-D Irish Immigrants in the Land of Canaan
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1312884593.1bDd4383.5704[at]bradford.ac.uk>
[IR-DLOG0310.txt] | |
Ir-D Irish Immigrants in the Land of Canaan | |
Email Patrick O'Sullivan | |
From Email Patrick O'Sullivan
We have heard curiously little about Kerby Miller's new book, Miller, Schrier, Boling and Doyle, Irish Immigrants in the Land of Canaan, 2003. And I can't help wondering if Oxford University Press is giving the publication the support it deserves. I have seen only one review, in Irish Voice, where the reviewer seemed over-awed by the book. Presumably scholarly reviews for the obvious journals are in the pipeline - or are they? Does anyone know more. I have pasted in below further information from the publisher's web site. This is an important work within Irish Diaspora Studies. On one level, the book is an extensively edited collection of early Irish (Protestant and Catholic) immigrants' letters, with nearly 70 short chapters, each one of which focuses on one or a few immigrant families, their experiences in Ireland and America, and their letters or memoirs. Each immigrant, his/her family, her/his historical context on both sides of the ocean, are described and analyzed in detail and depth. It is kind of a collective biography of the early Irish migrant experience in colonial and revolutionary America. The immigrants include Revolutionary soldiers, politicians, and loyalists, farmers, artisans, indentured servants, merchants, clergymen, women... The book is thus an essential part of the discussion of the use of letters and memoirs, which is now such an issue within Irish Diaspora Studies, and all diaspora studies. On another level, and just as important for our purposes, the book is an extended essay on the development of "Irish" and "Scotch-Irish" identities and political cultures, and the important causes and consequences of those developments, on both sides of the Atlantic. Patrick O'Sullivan http://www.oup-usa.org/isbn/0195154894.html Irish Immigrants in the Land of Canaan Letters and Memoirs from Colonial and Revolutionary America, 1675-1815 Written and Edited by KERBY A. MILLER, ARNOLD SCHRIER, BRUCE D. BOLING, and DAVID N. DOYLE Irish Immigrants in the Land of Canaan is a monumental and pathbreaking study of early Irish Protestant and Catholic migration to America. Through exhaustive research and sensitive analyses of the letters, memoirs, and other writings, the authors describe the variety and vitality of early Irish immigrant experiences, ranging from those of frontier farmers and seaport workers to revolutionaries and loyalists. Largely through the migrants own words, it brings to life the networks, work, and experiences of these immigrants who shaped the formative stages of American society and its Irish communities. The authors explore why Irishmen and women left home and how they adapted to colonial and revolutionary America, in the process creating modern Irish and Irish-American identities on the two sides of the Atlantic Ocean. "compulsory reading for anyone interested in early Irish immigration to the Americas, or indeed migration history in general.Undergraduates and graduates alike will find much to mull over-some "hot topics" coveredby the book are identity formation, the religious upheavals of the mid eighteenth century, and the creation of a dynamic Atlantic culture. A truly innovative collection of vibrant and compelling accounts of migration which not only illuminates the migrant experience, but sets the standard for future works in this field."-- New York Irish History "History at its most intimate....a groundbreaking study of early Irish (Protestant and Catholic) immigration to America." --Irish Voice "This is the most vivid and moving collection of letters and memoirs concerning any immigrant group to mainland North America during the Colonial and Early National periods. The documents are intelligently organized and brilliantly contextualized. Altogether it is a glorious achievement."--Nicholas Canny, National University of Ireland, Galway "Irish Immigrants in the Land of Canaan is sure to become a major landmark, setting an exemplary standard for study of both Irish-American history and American immigration and ethnic history more generally. The documents are elegantly presented, extensively annotated, and framed by contextual and biographical essays that wonderfully illuminate the rich humanity of the migrant experience."--Kevin Kenny, Boston College "An indispensable and inexhaustible treasure-trove for the student of not only emigration from Ireland to America, but of emigration in general, and of culture contact in the Atlantic world in particular."-Joe Lee, Glucksman Ireland House, New York University "This book's stunning richness in original letters and memoirs is both broad and intimate, covering all of the 18th century migrations as well as offering unprecedented closeness to the words and experiences of the emigrants. Creatively edited and annotated by some of the finest scholars in the field, it is a masterwork and is bound to become an indispensable companion to all research and teaching of the subject."-Robert Scally, New York University "A monumental work of meticulous scholarship."--Kevin Whelan, Keough-Notre Dame Centre, Dublin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ---- Kerby A. Miller is Middlebush Professor of History at the University of Missouri, Columbia. Arnold Schrier is the Walter C. Langsam Professor Emeritus of History, University of Cincinnati. Bruce D. Boling is Senior Cataloger, University of New Mexico General Library. David Noel Doyle is Statutory Lecturer in History, University College-Dublin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ---- 816 pp.; 21 halftones & 6 maps; 7 x 10; 0-19-515489-4 | |
TOP |