7341 | 17 February 2007 10:46 |
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 10:46:07 -0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
National Days | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: Jim McAuley Subject: National Days MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Paddy, I'm sure that this will be of great interest to some on the list. Nationa= l days and diaspora is flagged up as an area of specific attention. Can you= do the necessary please? All best wishes, As always, Jim INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATIONAL DAYS: GLASGOW, SCOTLAND: 29-30 NOVEMBER 2007 NATIONAL DAYS: SUMMONING THE NATION? Celebrating, commemorating, communicating, contesting=85 Le quatorze juillet, Independence Day, Burns Night, la Diada de Catalunya= , Thanksgiving, syttende mai, Super Bowl Sunday, el D=EDa de la Hispanidad,= ???=85 All these =96 and many more =96 are days which =93summon=94, or att= empt to summon the =93nation=94: in some cases to large-scale, occasionally= extravagant public festivities and ceremonies, in others to more privatise= d, even domestic forms of national awareness. They may be related to great= historical events (usually battles =96 most often victories, less commonly= defeats), or they may be an attempt to erase the memory of historical even= ts: Russia=92s recently instituted National Unity Day, now celebrated on 4 = November, appears to be an attempt to =91erase=92 the memory of earlier cel= ebrations of the Russian Revolution. In yet other cases they may provide a= framework for celebrations of nationhood linked to would-be =93epic=94 spo= rting events, to the lives of saints, to royal birthdays or even to literar= y figures such as Burns in Scotland or Cam=F5es in Portugal. Some of these =93nations=94 =96 like the Scots, the Catalans or the Qu=E9= b=E9cois =96 may be located within much larger, plurinational states, while= other National Days =96 such as the Latin American D=EDa de la Raza =96 cl= aim to unite different nations in a larger transnational community transcen= ding the boundaries of individual nation states. Yet others may include si= gnificant diasporic elements (the celebration of Saint Patrick=92s Day in t= he United States). But in any case what is a =93nation=94: do African Amer= icans and Hispanics enjoy a sense of ownership of Independence Day? Do Sco= ttish Muslims identify with Saint Andrew=92s Day? Is class a factor? For s= ome, are such days just an excuse for a day off work? And how are we to ac= count for those cases (such as the UK) where there is no official National = Day? In all cases the political dimension of National Days seems clear enough,= though its status may vary from hegemonic through informal to contestatory= . What forms of expression does this political dimension take? The celebr= ation of such days can also be linked to what are in some ways seen as =93h= oly places=94 (for example Montserrat in Catalonia) and often involve (very= ) significant movements of population. How are these sites managed? Do su= ch large migrations entail opportunities for national, or even internationa= l tourism? How are National Days mediated? How is this mediation managed = in multilingual societies? This conference welcomes proposals for twenty-minute papers on the subjec= t of National Days on: The politics of National Days National Days and the construction of the nation National Days and the invention of tradition National Days in the stateless nation The symbols and iconography of National Days National Days and class National Days and diasporas National Days and heritage sites National Days and religion The language and rhetoric of National Days National Days and gender Public and privatised National Days National Days in film, television, radio and the press National days and the internet National Days and tourism =85 and indeed other topics relating to the complex and multifaceted phen= omenon It is our intention to produce at least one edited collection of articles= based on conference papers. The conference will be held in Glasgow, Scotland, on 29 and 30 November 2= 007. Invited speakers include: Salvador Card=FAs, Universitat Aut=F2noma de Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain Hu Zhengrong, Communication University of China, Beijing Douglas Kellner, University of Central Los Angeles, USA David McCrone, Edinburgh University, Scotland Proposals (max. 250 words) should be sent, preferably by e-mail, to: Prof. Hugh O=92Donnell Cultural Business Group Glasgow Caledonian University Cowcaddens Road Glasgow G4 0BA Scotland (UK) Tel: +44 (0)141 331 3262 Fax: +44 (0)141 331 3264 e-mail: hod[at]gcal.ac.uk by Friday 30 April 2007 at the latest. Decisions on acceptance will be c= ommunicated by mid-May. Further information is available at: www.caledonian.ac.uk/nationaldays -----Original Message----- From: The Irish Diaspora Studies List on behalf of Patrick O'Sullivan Sent: Thu 2/8/2007 10:13 To: IR-D[at]JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [IR-D] CFP BAIS Liverpool September 2007, New Irelands Forwarded on behalf of Dr Yvonne Whelan Course Director, MSc Society and Space Lecturer in Human Geography School of Geographical Sciences University of Bristol University Road Bristol BS8 1SS England Tel: +44-(0)117-928-9107 Fax: +44-(0)117-928-7878 Email: yvonne.whelan[at]bristol.ac.uk http://www.ggy.bris.ac.uk/staff/staff_whelan.html New Irelands : Call for Conference Papers An interdisciplinary international conference 14-16 September 2007 under = the combined auspices of the British Association for Irish Studies, the Institute of Irish Studies and the Department of Politics of the Universi= ty of Liverpool The theme of the conference is the impact of both contemporary and histor= ic change on the island of Ireland. Recent years have seen steadily accumulating socio-economic, political, cultural and technological developments which have challenged institution= s, stereotypes and values in both parts of Ireland. But the island has also experienced significant innovation in the past, and, as well as notable disruptions, the Irish narrative is characterised by some intriguing continuities. The organisers would like to encourage contributions from the varied disciplines contributing to Irish Studies, including Literature, Politics= , Geography, History, Archaeology, Sociology, Film & Media Studies and the Visual Arts, and from people working in other fields of study who have an Irish dimension in their work. Papers are invited on the following themes: . Language, Literature and Identities . Construction & renewal of identities around gender, sexuality or religion . Commodifying Irish Pasts: Heritage, Landscape and Memory . The Irish Language, retreats & revivals . Transformation of the Irish Economies in the Nineteenth & Twentieth Centuries . Northern Ireland Society 'After the Troubles' . Imaging Historic and Contemporary Ireland in Film, Music & Performance . Diasporic Versions of Identity Each speaker will have 20 minutes for a presentation and will be expected= to take questions. Participants are encouraged to put together panel session= s (three papers of 20 minutes each). Abstracts of not more than 300 words should be sent as either hard copy or email attachment by 31 March 2007 t= o: Mervyn Busteed, Geography Discipline, School of Environment & Development= , Mansfield Cooper Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K. Email: mervynbusteed[at]hotmail.com; tel: 0161 928 8861 This transmission is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you r= eceive it in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and remove it fr= om your system. If the content of this e-mail does not relate to the busine= ss of the University of Huddersfield, then we do not endorse it and will ac= cept no liability. | |
TOP | |
7342 | 18 February 2007 14:22 |
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:22:24 -0600
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Review: Leo Lucassen. The Immigrant Threat: The Integration of | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: "William Mulligan Jr." Subject: Review: Leo Lucassen. The Immigrant Threat: The Integration of Old and New Migrants in Western Europe since 1850 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Forwarded from H-Ethnic. Leo Lucassen. _The Immigrant Threat: The Integration of Old and New Migrants in Western Europe since 1850_. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2005. 280 pp. Index, bibliography, tables, figures. $55.00 (cloth), ISBN 0-252-03046-X; $25.00 (paper), ISBN 0-252-07294-4. Reviewed for H-Ethnic by Christiane Harzig, Department of History, Arizona State University Is There a New Immigrant Threat? The book was born, as the author states in the conclusion, from a mixture of irritation and inspiration. As a migration historian well-versed in European and United States history, he could not help but notice the historicity of migration processes in the various European countries on the one hand and the possible comparison to similar developments in the U.S. In both cases the developments were accompanied by the tropes of "fear" and "threat": fear that the "new," more recent immigrants would not assimilate and thus would present a threat to the orderly and peaceful development of societies. In this discourse the values of the new immigrants, it is argued, are fundamentally opposed to the "Judeo-Christian" tradition (i.e., separation of church and state, equality of women). What is conveniently forgotten in this discourse, as Lucassen points out, is Europe's anti-Semitic past. He could have added that women in Western societies were not given equal rights on a silver platter either, but rather had to and still have to fight bitterly for equality and equity. Is there a lesson to be learned from U.S. history? Can our understanding of the European migration and integration processes, which Lucassen functionally defines as the process by which all people (migrants and non-migrants) find their place in society, be enhanced by looking at U.S. discussions and historical experiences (p. 18)? In the end, Lucassen wants to find out whether structural integration (using a modified concept of integration as process by Milton M. Gordon) over two generations in Europe today differs from what has been happening in the past. Are today's immigrants so fundamentally different (regarding race and culture) as to warrant the prediction that they will not be capable of assimilation? To what extend do the different structures of receiving societies in Europe provide different paths to integration and how do they compare to the integration scenario in the United States? Lucassen's research design is simple and most convincing. Choosing a number of social markers and characteristics such as stereotyping processes, social and political mobilization, intermarriage, social mobility, criminality, and residential patterns, and applying them to various dominant immigrant groups in the past and present, he attempts to draw conclusions about the (un)assimilablity of today's immigrants in Europe. For his comparison he chose "large and problematic" groups: Irish immigrants in Britain, Polish immigrants in Germany, Italian immigrants in France in the past; Caribbeans in Britain, Turks in Germany, and Algerians in France in the present. These are obvious and well-grounded choices. As Lucassen works through his research agenda, the reader is provided with a concise overview of the immigration histories of the various groups. We learn about the respective political context, the political, social, and cultural discourses accompanying the immigration process and the persistence (as in the case of the Irish) or the fading (as in the case of the Italians) of the negative stereotypes. For each of the immigration scenarios, Lucassen is able to reduce his otherwise highly differentiating analysis to one key factor responsible for determining the immigration trajectory. Regarding the Irish in Great Britain, he perceives the deeply felt religious divide between the Protestants and Catholics to be at the core of the ongoing estrangement of the Irish in British society. In the case of the Poles in the mining districts of western Germany, it was nationalism (on both the German and the Polish sides), which kept Polish workers and their families, who had established an associational structure approaching institutional completeness (churches, voluntary associations, press, even unions), separate from the host society. Both of these sentiments, religiosity and nationalism, Lucassen considers as more fundamental than the labor antagonism of Italian and French workers, which was at the root of anti-Italian xenophobia in France. Once Italian workers had understood the benefit of unionism and French unions were willing to overcome their perception of Italians as scabs, the road to integration was open for most Italian immigrants, especially when they came with their families. The French state, always more of an immigration state than Prussia/Germany or historical Great Britain, fostered and supported family-based immigration and thus helped Italians on their immigration trajectory. The new, post-1950s wave of immigration in Europe is often seen as fundamentally different from earlier patterns, awakening the fear that the conflation of cultural differences, skin color and socio-economic problems will produce a caste-type underclass, and thus create an "American problem." Upon closer analysis Lucassen sees a two-road integration model among immigrants from the Caribbean in Great Britain. While there are segregated clusters in places like Brixton and Notting Hill with high levels of unemployment and social problems, blacks, especially women with an education, show evidence of being on the road to integration. Here, class appears to be the most important factor in determining the long-term development of the integration process. For the "large and problematic" group of Turks in Germany, Lucassen argues against the "Brubaker paradigm," which claims that a rigorously applied ius sanguinis (hereditary national status) prevalent in Germany prevents Turks from integrating. He outlines instead the (partial) integration into the labor market (and he could have mentioned active union participation) despite high unemployment; the high degree of self-organization; and even school statistics, an issue of great concern in Germany, that provide room for optimism. Again, the women fare better than the men. The "German ethno-cultural hangover" indeed has its implications for the identification process of Turkish immigrants, but it has not stopped the integration process, which may be further along than is assumed in public discourse. The relationship between Algerians and natives in France is more complex than the other immigration scenarios under scrutiny here, because it is impacted by the conflicted history between the colonizers and the colonized. Again the author provides a brief but insightful analysis of Algerian migration to France and the political conflicts which accompanied this migration process. True, ghetto formation in low-rent housing is the result more of racism than of self-selection (in contrast to the Turks in Germany), and Algerians are reluctant to naturalize, (though their children demand to be treated as French, as indeed they are in terms of citizenship). Nevertheless, education and a good proficiency in French open roads to social and economic integration. The author considers the fear of rising fundamentalism among the Algerian immigrants as unfounded, and if it indeed gains more ground, it is more due to frustration than due to an "ingrained cultural tendency." Again Lucassen finds evidence for his major argument that, if these new "large and problematic" groups experience (more) difficulties in integration, it is not due to some fundamental, i.e. unchangeable, cultural characteristic, but rather due to political, social, and economic circumstances for which all parties involved bear responsibility. In the end, Lucassen concludes that "integration may be a slow, gendered and differentiated process, but also the children of migrants gradually become more similar to the established population, both in _structural_ and _identificational_ respects" (italics in original, p. 211). And he continues: the rapid cultural changes point "more in the direction of ongoing integration than toward the dawn of a multicultural society where descendants of immigrants remain visible and culturally distinct groups" (p. 212). Regarding the European-U.S. comparison, the analysis has shown that "the American debate is to some extent parochial and only partly applicable to other contexts" (p. 208). Considering the national self-definition (the U.S. as a nation of immigrants); the role of the welfare state (and its stern rejection of illegal immigrants in Europe); and the impact of color, (which seems less salient in Europe), there are limits of theorizing on the basis of the American experience. Whether you agree with his conclusions or not, in this book Lucassen has addressed a number of academically and politically pressing and challenging questions, and he has provided a thoroughly grounded historical cum sociological analysis. He has also opened up a number of issues for further analysis: I would like to see more studies on "intermarriage"; at the moment it is unclear to me what it actually measures and what kind of conclusions we can draw from it. Though Lucassen attempted to keep gender as an analytical category in his analysis, pointing to the leading role of women in the integration process, a closer look into the cultural differences of changing gender relations and gender dynamics during the migration and integration process may produce some interesting results. This book has the potential to provoke many stimulating discussions and could thus be a great read in a graduate class. Copyright (c) 2006 by H-Net, all rights reserved. H-Net permits the redistribution and reprinting of this work for nonprofit, educational purposes, with full and accurate attribution to the author, web location, date of publication, originating list, and H-Net: Humanities & Social Sciences Online. | |
TOP | |
7343 | 18 February 2007 19:14 |
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:14:03 -0500
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: Carmel McCaffrey Subject: Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Edmundo, I was in Dublin last weekend and I would not hold my breath about the meaning behind this gesture. In the first place the writer seems to me to be a bit Pollyannaish about the whole thing - he/she didn't even get the day of the match right, it was Sunday the 11th Feb, not Saturday as he/she wrote. Was the writer even a rugby fan? . The situation for the GAA is far more complex than the writer states - government subsidies for Croke Park being one issue. While it is certainly time for Croker to share its space I don't think that "everyone" was a winner - the end of the match was a heart breaker for Ireland! Nearly all of the comments I heard were certainly not in any way complimentary, or should I say reconciliatory, about the English coming to Croke Park and many were actually saying that it was a pity that it was not the English march which was first - so "we could beat the hell out of them" as one rugby fan - who also plays rugby for one of the Dublin clubs - put it. Not sure that this will happen based on Ireland's form but we can only hope. The crowd standing on the rubble of 1916 - Hill 16 - will certainly will it to happen. As for the Bloody Sunday "myth" it was central to many conversations that I heard last week and I was even surprised at how present it was. In spite of the best efforts of the revisionists to play down this event - and other auxiliary atrocities - it still has strong meaning for many in Dublin who witnessed it, and their descendants. Carmel Murray, Edmundo wrote: > http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/opinion/article2265446.ece > > Dear Paddy, > > Would this news be interesting for ID list members? It is an evidence > that the only way to overthrow myths (English as foreign to Irish) is > creating fresh, younger myths (Ireland as a developed country). Perhaps > the history of the Irish in certain Latin American countries illustrates > that the Irish have more in common than apart with the British. > > Edmundo > > . > > | |
TOP | |
7344 | 19 February 2007 08:39 |
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:39:19 -0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: "MacEinri, Piaras" Subject: Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Morning Carmel (from a very wet and stormy Cork) Obviously there are different points of view about this, but I'd like to take up one point - the reference to government subsidies for Croke Park. The overall level of subsidies for Croke Park has been extremely modest and needs to be seen in context. The GAA is the largest amateur sporting organisation (per head of population) of its kind anywhere; it competes successfully with other codes and remains comfortably ahead of them all; women's gaelic football is the fastest-growing sport in Ireland. It operated for decades with no subsidies at all in a country which is still, in many ways, a parody of a social democracy and provides few if any sporting and leisure facilities such as those which are taken for granted in the smallest French or Catalan town. The GAA agreed by a vote of its own membership to open Croke Park for a limited period for certain major rugby and soccer games. It was a democratic decision, fully debated. I don't believe that government subsidies played any significant role. Whether one agrees with the decision are not I think most people in Ireland do see it as a watershed. I am not an uncritical support of the GAA. Its upper echelons are still populated by dinosaurs, some of whom think the only function of women in the organisation is to make the tea and sandwiches while others regard the media and any kind of public scrutiny with the deepest suspicion, if not hostility. But it could beat the entirely amateurish so-called professionals of the Football Association of Ireland and Irish Rugby Football Union into a cocked hat any day. Piaras | |
TOP | |
7345 | 19 February 2007 10:58 |
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:58:35 -0330
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: Peter Hart Subject: Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this secretiveness etc. extends to their archives as well. Assuming they have one, properly speaking. As far as I know, no scholar has ever had access - it's as big a hole in historiography as the lack of a full history of the Gaelic League. And if I could add one thing: if your'e interested in hurling, do read Denis Walsh's Hurling: the Revolution Years. It's a terrific piece of sports writing. Peter Hart | |
TOP | |
7346 | 19 February 2007 11:38 |
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:38:12 -0500
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: Carmel McCaffrey Subject: Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Piaras, There was much talk in Dublin about the government "giving" around 60 to 70 million of taxpayer money to the improvements at the Croke stadium. Isn't this a fact? I thought that this formed very much a part of the talk surrounding the demand for a new stadium for football and rugby back in 2001 and 2002 - which has ended up with Landsdowne Rd being re-built because Mary Harney would not go along with the idea of "Bertie's bowl". Growing up as I did in a household devoted to "foreign" sport - memories of listening to the Ashes clash on shortwave radio- I find it all fascinating and something that many outside of Ireland probably find quite puzzling. [But I did also stand with my grandfather and father on Hill 16 during Dublin matches]. I do agree with you that many inside the GAA now seem to want change of some ilk. I also am listening in on RTE to the heated debate about the British national anthem being played at Croker. Birth pangs of a nation.. Carmel MacEinri, Piaras wrote: > Morning Carmel (from a very wet and stormy Cork) > > Obviously there are different points of view about this, but I'd like to > take up one point - the reference to government subsidies for Croke Park. > The overall level of subsidies for Croke Park has been extremely modest and > needs to be seen in context. The GAA is the largest amateur sporting > organisation (per head of population) of its kind anywhere; it competes > successfully with other codes and remains comfortably ahead of them all; > women's gaelic football is the fastest-growing sport in Ireland. It operated > for decades with no subsidies at all in a country which is still, in many > ways, a parody of a social democracy and provides few if any sporting and > leisure facilities such as those which are taken for granted in the smallest > French or Catalan town. > > The GAA agreed by a vote of its own membership to open Croke Park for a > limited period for certain major rugby and soccer games. It was a democratic > decision, fully debated. I don't believe that government subsidies played > any significant role. > > Whether one agrees with the decision are not I think most people in Ireland > do see it as a watershed. > > I am not an uncritical support of the GAA. Its upper echelons are still > populated by dinosaurs, some of whom think the only function of women in the > organisation is to make the tea and sandwiches while others regard the media > and any kind of public scrutiny with the deepest suspicion, if not > hostility. But it could beat the entirely amateurish so-called professionals > of the Football Association of Ireland and Irish Rugby Football Union into a > cocked hat any day. > > Piaras > > . > > | |
TOP | |
7347 | 19 February 2007 11:50 |
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:50:52 -0500
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: William Jenkins Subject: Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park Comments: To: Peter Hart In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit A three-volume study of the history of the GAA in Dublin (city and county) was published either last year or 2005. Edited by William Nolan; publisher Geography Publications, Dublin (who also publish the Irish County History Series) Not sure if access was granted for those volumes, and someone else will have to check since I am in Toronto and my copies are in Dublin! Willie Jenkins Quoting Peter Hart : > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this secretiveness etc. extends to > their archives as well. Assuming they have one, properly speaking. As > far as I know, no scholar has ever had access - it's as big a hole > in historiography as the lack of a full history of the Gaelic League. > > And if I could add one thing: if your'e interested in hurling, do read > Denis Walsh's Hurling: the Revolution Years. It's a terrific piece of > sports writing. > > Peter Hart > | |
TOP | |
7348 | 19 February 2007 11:58 |
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:58:50 -0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Post in Migration Studies [at]Trinity | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: Jim McAuley Subject: Post in Migration Studies [at]Trinity MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Please let interested parties know. University of Dublin, Trinity College Post Title: Lectureship in Sociology Status: Permanent Dept/Faculty: School of Social Sciences and Philosophy Closing Date: 12 noon on Thursday, 8th March, 2007. Salary: Appointment will be made between points 1-8 of the Lecturer salar= y scale: EUR 35,718 - EUR 50,399 per annum The Department of Sociology seeks to make this appointment in the area of= migration studies and this post is tenable from 1st October, 2007. The app= ointee will be expected to contribute to the undergraduate programme in Soc= iology and to existing and planned Masters/PhD courses. Other duties will i= nclude the supervision of doctoral and other research theses, and consolida= ting and developing the research profile of the department in migration and= ethnicity studies in line with the newly-founded Trinity Immigration Initi= ative. The appointee will also be expected to take on various administrativ= e responsibilities. Candidates will have a PhD in Sociology or a cognate discipline and a dev= eloped qualitative and/or quantitative methodological competence. The appoi= ntee will have an established record of research and publication in migrati= on studies, experience in teaching and supervision at both undergraduate an= d postgraduate level, and a proven track record of research funding. Further information about the department can be found on its website http://www.tcd.ie/Sociology/ http://peoplefinder.tcd.ie/ Informal enquiries should be addressed to Hilary Tovey, e-mail: htovey[at]tc= d.ie Please click on link for Further Particulars We welcome applications by e-mail. Please note there is no application fo= rm to be completed. Candidates should submit a full curriculum vitae, to include the names of= three referees and a letter of application, to: Recruitment Executive Staff Office Trinity College Dublin 2 Tel: +353 1 896 1749 Fax: +353 1 677 2694 Email:claire.walsh[at]tcd.ie TRINITY COLLEGE IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES EMPLOYER Dr Ronit Lentin Senior lecturer in Sociology / Course coordinator MPhil in Ethnic and Racial Studies Department of Sociology School of Social Sciences and Philosophy Trinity College Dublin Ireland 353 1 8962766 / rlentin[at]tcd.ie www.ethnicracialstudies.net -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------------------- Jim McAuley Professor of Political Sociology and Irish Studies School of Human & Health Sciences The University of Huddersfield West Yorkshire HD1 3DH England Telephone: +44(0)1484 - 472691 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------------------- 'The most important factor for the development of the individual is the s= tructure and values of the society into which they were born'. Eric Fromm. ------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------- This transmission is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you r= eceive it in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and remove it fr= om your system. If the content of this e-mail does not relate to the busine= ss of the University of Huddersfield, then we do not endorse it and will ac= cept no liability. | |
TOP | |
7349 | 19 February 2007 12:16 |
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:16:53 -0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Book Announced, Braber, Jews in Glasgow 1879-1939 | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: Patrick O'Sullivan Subject: Book Announced, Braber, Jews in Glasgow 1879-1939 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jews in Glasgow, 1879-1939. Immigration and Integration by Ben Braber Vallentine Mitchell have published Jews in Glasgow, 1879-1939. Immigration and Integration by Ben Braber. This book is a case study of Jews from eastern and central Europe who settled in Glasgow between 1879 and 1939. The individual chapters review aspects of their immigration and integration into Scottish society, namely: the reaction of the native population and the Jewish responses; the education of immigrant children; the participation of Jews in the Glasgow economy; their involvement in the political and arts world; and changes in Jewish organisations, religious habits and life style. A special chapter is devoted to post-1945 developments, bringing the history of the Jews in Glasgow up to the present date. The final chapter compares the Jewish experience in Glasgow to that of Jews in English cities and other immigrants in Glasgow such as the Irish, Italians, Germans and Asians. The book is available from Vallentine Mitchell, please contact toby.harris[at]vmbooks.com Ben Braber is an Honorary Research Fellow in the Department of History at the University of Glasgow. He is currently working on two research projects. The first project utilises a combination of primary and secondary sources and applies a broad historical approach to examine integration of immigrants in Scotland after 1760. Placing Scotland within a wider international context by comparing Scottish developments to what happened in countries similar in size and ethnic make-up such as Ireland, the Netherlands and Belgium, it is a comparative study dealing with aspects of social, cultural, political and economic history. The second aims at providing a new perspective on Jewish and Dutch history by examining Jewish resistance and participation in general resistance movements in the Netherlands during the second world war within the wider context of the integration of Jews into Dutch society, and comparing Dutch developments to what happened in similar western European countries that were occupied during the war such as Denmark, Belgium and France, and to developments in Germany and Italy. He can be reached by email on benbraber[at]btinternet.com | |
TOP | |
7350 | 19 February 2007 12:18 |
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:18:16 -0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
CFP Re-presenting Diasporas in Cinema and New (Digital) Media | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: Patrick O'Sullivan Subject: CFP Re-presenting Diasporas in Cinema and New (Digital) Media MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =A0 Re-presenting Diaspora(s) in cinema and=20 New (Digital) Media =A0 An international conference=20 Hosted by the University of Exeter July 24-25th, 2007 =A0 Confirmed participants include: =A0 Hamid Naficy (Keynote) Roshini Kempadoo (Keynote) John Akomfrah Rajinder Dudrah Eddie George Error! Bookmark not defined. Anna Piva =A0 We are also delighted to announce the participation of Coco Fusco, who = will be presenting a screening of her recent work followed by discussion =A0 The =91Re-presenting Diasporas in Cinema and New (Digital) Media=92 = conference aims to break new and significant intellectual ground by offering a = forum for academics, filmmakers and digital artists to question the current = state of theorizing around issues of diaspora in both research and = practice.=A0 Through a mixture of papers, panels and presentations of = practitioners=92 work, the conference aims to address issues such as: =A0 =95 Is the often contested (and at times abstract theoretical) notion of =91Diaspora' still viable?=20 =95 Can new (digital) media offer a means of connection or greater = coherency to our understanding of diasporas around the globe?=20 =95 How might these translate into new forms of digital representation = to articulate established questions of diaspora, history/memory and = cultural identity?=20 =95 What is cinema's place in all of this? =A0 Visit the conference webpage: =A0 http://www.sall.ex.ac.uk/content/view/710/3/ =A0 Please send abstracts of no more than 350 words to the conference = organisers (contact details below) by 15th FEBRUARY 2007.=A0 Filmmakers/artists/practitioners intending to screen/show/present their = work on a panel are strongly encouraged to submit clips/excerpts from the film/work as part of their proposal. =A0 For more information, to request a booking form or to submit a proposal, please contact the conference organisers: =A0 Dr Will = Higbee=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Dr Sa=EBr Maty B=E2 w.e.higbee[at]exeter.ac.uk=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= s.m.ba[at]exeter.ac.uk Tel: (0044) 1392 264 431=A0 (0044) 7884168008 Centre for Research into Film Studies (CRIFS) School of Arts, Languages, and Literatures Room BG30, Queen's Building, University of Exeter Exeter, Devon EX4 4QH UK =91Re-presenting Diasporas in Cinema and New (Digital) Media=92 is = supported by: =A0 =95=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 The British Academy =95=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 The Information Society Network (ISN), = Exeter University [http://shl.stanford.edu:3455/3/Home] =95=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Migrations and Diaspora Interdisciplinary = Thematic Network (ITN), Exeter University =A0 =A0 =A0 | |
TOP | |
7351 | 19 February 2007 15:51 |
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:51:48 +0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: "Anthony McNicholas." Subject: Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit marcus bourke has written about the gaa, would he not have had access? anthony Dr. Anthony McNicholas Communication and Media Research Institute University of Westminster 0118 948 6164 (BBC Written Archive Centre) 07751 062 735 (m) 020 8995 6625 (h) Quoting Peter Hart : > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this secretiveness etc. extends to > their archives as well. Assuming they have one, properly speaking. As > far as I know, no scholar has ever had access - it's as big a hole > in historiography as the lack of a full history of the Gaelic League. > > And if I could add one thing: if your'e interested in hurling, do read > Denis Walsh's Hurling: the Revolution Years. It's a terrific piece of > sports writing. > > Peter Hart > | |
TOP | |
7352 | 19 February 2007 16:21 |
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:21:45 -0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: "James A. Lundon [at] Home" Subject: Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit My understanding is that the GAA have very little archives to allow access to. There have been any number of histories written about the GAA but very few, if any, are rigorous and purely academic in nature. Kevin Whelan recently (2006 Merriman School?) wrote a long paper on the GAA, which might be a prelude to a full length book on the subject. James. -----Original Message----- From: The Irish Diaspora Studies List [mailto:IR-D[at]JISCMAIL.AC.UK]On Behalf Of Anthony McNicholas. Sent: 19 February 2007 15:52 To: IR-D[at]JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [IR-D] Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park marcus bourke has written about the gaa, would he not have had access? anthony Dr. Anthony McNicholas Communication and Media Research Institute University of Westminster 0118 948 6164 (BBC Written Archive Centre) 07751 062 735 (m) 020 8995 6625 (h) Quoting Peter Hart : > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this secretiveness etc. extends to > their archives as well. Assuming they have one, properly speaking. As > far as I know, no scholar has ever had access - it's as big a hole > in historiography as the lack of a full history of the Gaelic League. > > And if I could add one thing: if your'e interested in hurling, do read > Denis Walsh's Hurling: the Revolution Years. It's a terrific piece of > sports writing. > > Peter Hart > | |
TOP | |
7353 | 19 February 2007 17:54 |
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:54:09 +0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: Muiris Mag Ualghairg Subject: Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline This is my first time posting here and I've been biting my tongue all day reading these emails but I feel that I have to answer this part. It is fashionable in Ireland in some quarters to argue that any thing peculiarly Irish is somehow or other insular and narrow and what happens outside of Ireland, generally meaning Britain, is 'international' and 'cosmopolitan'. While I'm sure that Carmel's comments do not intend to reflect this view, the reference to 'people outside of Ireland' and suggesting that they probably find it puzzling does fit in with this view. The reality is that most people outside of Ireland are not discussing this issue, nor are they really going to be concerned about it. It would be a non-issue for them. But it does appear to be an issue which is being used within Ireland to beat one particular concept of Irishness and appears to me to be part and parcel of a particular type of 'West Britishness Irishness' - valid though that may be as an expression of Irishness, which wants to reinterpret 'Irishness' as a green version of Britishness. I should perhaps also explain that I do not live in Ireland, although my parents are from Ireland, and quite frankly don't mind what games are played in Croke Park but I equally don't see why this issue should be blown up as some kind of 'coming of age' right for the Irish. The British really aren't going to care that much where a rugby game is played nor are they likely to think about a massacre that occurred nearly a hundred years ago - they have been involved in many more since then and I doubt that it will exercise much concern for them when England comes to play in Croke park. The question of the national Anthem is another issue, do they play the Irish national Anthem when Ireland plays in London? I'm not sure what the present policy is on this, but if they don't then I would expect the same policy to be enforced in Ireland. As for the Birth Pangs of a nation - the 'nation' has been in existance for centuries (if not millennia) and the two states for nearly 80 years, which in the modern European context makes Ireland almost ancient! Muiris On 19/02/07, Carmel McCaffrey wrote: > Piaras, > > Growing up as I did in a household devoted to > "foreign" sport - memories of listening to the Ashes clash on shortwave > radio- I find it all fascinating and something that many outside of > Ireland probably find quite puzzling. | |
TOP | |
7354 | 19 February 2007 17:58 |
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:58:53 -0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: "micheal.ohaodha" Subject: Re: Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park In-Reply-To: A MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable With reference to the previous emails and some of the "dinosaurs" which = Piaras correctly alludes to - and taking into account the fact that = there are divergent points of view on the opening up of Croke Park which = is undoubtedly a watershed historically - it is worth pointing out I = think that the debates at club level and "on-the-ground" (about opening = up Croke Park)- as I know from my own local GAA club here in Limerick = and in Galway where I played as a young lad - were much more heated and = divisive than the Irish media might portray them. Also much of the = debate as relating to the people at the "upper-echelons" of the = Assocation was spin/media-driven - hence the "incomprehensible" = responses by certain sections of the "Dublin 4" media when many of the = Northern counties had strong reservations about it (or voted against the = proposal to open up Croke Park) All the best=20 Michael Hayes=20 Department of English and History=20 University of Limerick=20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: The Irish Diaspora Studies List [mailto:IR-D[at]JISCMAIL.AC.UK]On Behalf Of Carmel McCaffrey Sent: 19 February 2007 16:38 To: IR-D[at]JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [IR-D] Polemics in Modern day Ireland - Croke Park Piaras, There was much talk in Dublin about the government "giving" around 60 to = 70 million of taxpayer money to the improvements at the Croke stadium. =20 Isn't this a fact? I thought that this formed very much a part of the=20 talk surrounding the demand for a new stadium for football and rugby=20 back in 2001 and 2002 - which has ended up with Landsdowne Rd being=20 re-built because Mary Harney would not go along with the idea of=20 "Bertie's bowl". Growing up as I did in a household devoted to=20 "foreign" sport - memories of listening to the Ashes clash on shortwave = radio- I find it all fascinating and something that many outside of=20 Ireland probably find quite puzzling. [But I did also stand with my =20 grandfather and father on Hill 16 during Dublin matches]. I do agree=20 with you that many inside the GAA now seem to want change of some ilk. I also am listening in on RTE to the heated debate about the British=20 national anthem being played at Croker. Birth pangs of a nation.. Carmel MacEinri, Piaras wrote: > Morning Carmel (from a very wet and stormy Cork) > > Obviously there are different points of view about this, but I'd like = to > take up one point - the reference to government subsidies for Croke = Park. > The overall level of subsidies for Croke Park has been extremely = modest and > needs to be seen in context. The GAA is the largest amateur sporting > organisation (per head of population) of its kind anywhere; it = competes > successfully with other codes and remains comfortably ahead of them = all; > women's gaelic football is the fastest-growing sport in Ireland. It = operated > for decades with no subsidies at all in a country which is still, in = many > ways, a parody of a social democracy and provides few if any sporting = and > leisure facilities such as those which are taken for granted in the = smallest > French or Catalan town.=20 > > The GAA agreed by a vote of its own membership to open Croke Park for = a > limited period for certain major rugby and soccer games. It was a = democratic > decision, fully debated. I don't believe that government subsidies = played > any significant role.=20 > > Whether one agrees with the decision are not I think most people in = Ireland > do see it as a watershed. > > I am not an uncritical support of the GAA. Its upper echelons are = still > populated by dinosaurs, some of whom think the only function of women = in the > organisation is to make the tea and sandwiches while others regard the = media > and any kind of public scrutiny with the deepest suspicion, if not > hostility. But it could beat the entirely amateurish so-called = professionals > of the Football Association of Ireland and Irish Rugby Football Union = into a > cocked hat any day. > > Piaras > > . > > =20 | |
TOP | |
7355 | 20 February 2007 10:06 |
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:06:20 -0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Article, Daly, | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: Patrick O'Sullivan Subject: Article, Daly, The Irish Free State/Eire/Republic of Ireland/Ireland: "A country by any other name"? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Email Patrick O'Sullivan A number of IR-D members will find useful this article, by one of the Mary Dalys. I think it is the first time I have seen a sober historian's study of the tensions and ambiguities around the use, in different places, of different words for the state or states and the island. Signed One of the Patrick O'Sullivans Reference Type: Journal Article Author: Daly, M. E.; Title: The Irish Free State/Eire/Republic of Ireland/Ireland: "A country by any other name"? Year: 2007 Journal: Journal of British Studies Volume: 46 Issue: 1 Pages: 72-90 Accession Number: ISI:000243310700005 Author Address: Univ Coll Dublin, Coll Arts & Celt Studies, Dublin 2, Ireland. Daly, ME, Univ Coll Dublin, Coll Arts & Celt Studies, Dublin 2, Ireland. Language: English | |
TOP | |
7356 | 20 February 2007 10:20 |
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:20:30 -0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Article, Celticity and storyteller identity | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: Patrick O'Sullivan Subject: Article, Celticity and storyteller identity MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Email Patrick O'Sullivan I have not been able to see this article, but it is certainly an interesting, and timely, study. There does seem to be here some discussion about authenticity, and I wonder how it is handled, or justified. P.O'S. Title: Celticity and storyteller identity: The use and misuse of ethnicity to develop a storyteller's sense of self Author(s): Ryan P (Ryan, Patrick) Source: FOLKLORE 117 (3): 313-328 DEC 2006 Document Type: Article Language: English Cited References: 43 Times Cited: 0 Find Related Records Information Abstract: This paper looks at the self-representation of contemporary or revival storytellers claiming "Celtic" identity for themselves as storytellers, largely based on imagined traits of generic "Celtic" storytellers and storytelling styles, and content, which are conveyed via commercial images, suppositions about the Romantic era, and other mediated, second-hand or even erroneous sources. At the same time, such representations are compared with the self-representations of three traditional storytellers from Ireland and Scotland. Addresses: Ryan P (reprint author), Univ Glamorgan, George Ewart Evans Storytelling Ctr, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, M Glam Wales Univ Glamorgan, George Ewart Evans Storytelling Ctr, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, M Glam Wales Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND Subject Category: Folklore IDS Number: 122MS ISSN: 0015-587X | |
TOP | |
7357 | 20 February 2007 10:46 |
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:46:03 -0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
TOC IRISH ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL HISTORY, VOL 33; 2006 | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: Patrick O'Sullivan Subject: TOC IRISH ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL HISTORY, VOL 33; 2006 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Email Patrick O'Sullivan This TOC has at last turned up, and I can point out a number of items of interest to IR-D. Predictably I have a number of problems with the little Symposium by (Ir-D members) Delaney, Kenny and MacRaild... There have been a number of off-list comments. From my point of view, with my usual self-denying ordinance, and briefly, as a working writer, I have difficulty in engaging with discussions about the meaning of words. For a writer, words are wriggly imps that have to hammered into sentences. Looking back at my own archive I see that Miriam Nyhan first contacted us in May 2003 about her work on Ford of Cork. And we here had some discussion about connections with Ford of Dagenham. I think that the workings of these 2 or more base multi-nationals is a special area of interest to Irish Diaspora Studies - I think of the work of Marilyn Cohen. Our congratulations to Miriam Nyhan... The TOC has come in with a full list of Book Reviews - always a strength of IESH. Breathnach, on the Congested Districts Board, is of course of interest. Often the obvious takes a long time to do. I have already shared with a friend who collects glass the review of Brian Havel, Maestro of Crystal: The Story of Miroslav Havel. The connections between Czech glass and Waterford glass have always been obvious to anyone with eyes - but the publicity of the Waterford company has tended to stress the Irish 'tradition' rather than the importance of Bacik and Havel, and it has been difficult to point to a good source for that. The reviewer quite rightly points out the importance of 'the North American' market, in terms of marketing and product design - a fascinating example of the creation, or re-creation, of a product and a tradition for the diasporic market. Another review of the Clarkson and Crawford (eds), collection Famine and Disease in Ireland. I remember saying to Peter Gray a long time ago that - it sounded mad but - we needed a proper new edition of Trevelyan, The Irish Crisis. I don't know if Clarkson and Crawford have provided this - and, given the price of the thing, am never likely to know. And, in the same issue of the journal a frankly sniffy review by Larry Geary of Robin Haines, Charles Trevelyan and the Great Irish Famine. A good issue of the journal... P.O'S. IRISH ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL HISTORY VOL 33; 2006 ISSN 0332-4893 pp. 1-17 The No Income Tax Campaign: Twenty-First-Century Tax Philosophy in 1920s Ireland. Coleman, K.; Considine, J. pp. 18-34 Narration and Memory: The Experiences of the Workforce of a Ford Plant. Nyhan, M. pp. 35-45 The Irish Diaspora. Delaney, E. pp. 46-50 Diaspora and Irish Migration History. Kenny, K. pp. 51-58 `Diaspora' and `Transnationalism': Theory and Evidence in Explanation of the Irish World-wide. MacRaild, D. pp. 59-67 Religious Polarisation, Church Reform, and Evangelicalism in Ireland, c. 1770-1850. Holmes, A. pp. 68-69 National Archives: Survey of Business Records. Donnelly, B. pp. 70-71 Recent Accessions of Interest to the Social and Economic Historian. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland pp. 72-73 `All in a Confused Opposition to Each Other': Politics and War in Connacht, 1641-9. Duignan, A. pp. 74-75 Science in its Local Context: The Belfast Natural History and Philosophical Society in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. Bayles, R. B. pp. 76-77 Farmers, Agriculture and Politics in the Irish Free State Area, 1919-36. Ryan, R. pp. 78-84 Select List of Writings on Irish Economic and Social History published in 2006. Regan, J. M. p. 85 Joost Augusteijn and Mary Ann Lyons (eds), Irish History: A Research Yearbook 2. Holmes, J. p. 86 T.C. Barnard, The Kingdom of Ireland, 1641-1760, British History in Perspective. McKay, J. p. 86 T.C. Barnard and W.G. Neely (eds), The Clergy of the Church of Ireland, 1000-2000. MacCarthy, R. pp. 87-88 Maxine Berg, Luxury and Pleasure in Eighteenth-century Britain. Kelly, J. pp. 89-90 Ciara Breathnach, The Congested Districts Board of Ireland, 1891-1923: Poverty and Development in the West of Ireland. King, C. pp. 91-92 Edel Bhreathnach (ed.), The Kingship and Landscape of Tara. Manning, C. pp. 93-95 David J. Buther, South Tipperary 1570-1841: Religion, Land and Rivalry. Nolan, W. p. 96 Fergus Campbell, Land and Revolution: Nationalist Politics in the West of Ireland 1891-1921. McNamara, C. pp. 97-98 Liam Chambers, Michael Moore, c.1639-1726: Provost of Trinity, Rector of Paris. Kelly, J. p. 99 Leslie Clarkson and E. Margaret Crawford (eds), Famine and Disease in Ireland. Jones, G. p. 100 Bryn Coldrick, Rossin, county Meath: An Unofficial Place, Maynooth Studies in Local History 44. Stout, G. p. 101 Marie Coleman, County Limerick and the Irish Revolution 1910-1923; Daniel McCarthy, Ireland's Banner County: Clare from the Fall of Parnell to the Great War 1890-1918. McMahon, D. pp. 102-103 Paul Connell, The Diocese of Meath under Bishop John Cantwell, 1830-66. Keogh, D. pp. 104-105 Ruth Connolly and Ann Coughlan (eds), New Voices in Irish Criticism Volume Five; Gifford Lewis, Edith Somerville: A Biography. Allen, N. pp. 106-108 John Crowley, Robert Devoy, Denis Linehan and Patrick O'Flanagan (eds), Atlas of Cork City. MacManus, R. pp. 109-112 David Dickson, Old World Colony: Cork and South Munster, 1630-1830. Chartres, J. A. pp. 113-114 Sean Duffy, The Concise History of Ireland; Ruth Dudley Edwards, with Bridget Hourican, An Atlas of Irish History. Pike, S. p. 115 Maire Therese Flanagan, Irish Royal Charters: Texts and Contexts. Edwards, T. M. C. pp. 116-117 Louise Fuller, Irish Catholicism since 1950: The Undoing of a Culture. Foster, R. F. pp. 118-120 Laurence M. Geary and Margaret Kelleher (eds), Nineteenth-Century Ireland: A Guide to Recent Research; Terence McDonough (ed.), Was Ireland a Colony?: Economics, Politics and Culture in Nineteenth-Century Ireland. Mathuna, L. M. p. 121 Raymond Gillespie (ed.), The Vestry Records of the Parishes of St Catherine and St James, Dublin, 1657-1692. Kelly, J. pp. 122-123 Robin Haines, Charles Trevelyan and the Great Irish Famine. Geary, L. M. pp. 124-125 Brian Havel, Maestro of Crystal: The Story of Miroslav Havel. Whitty, A. pp. 126-127 D.W. Hayton (ed.), Letters of Marmaduke Coghill, 1722-1738. Chambers, L. pp. 128-129 William Kelly and John R. Young (eds), Ulster and Scotland, 1600-2000: History, Language and Identity. Patterson, B. pp. 130-132 Fintan Lane and Donal O Drisceoil (eds), Politics and the Irish Working Class, 1830-1945. Lochlainn, A. N. p. 133 Marie-Louise Legg (ed.) The Diary of Nicholas Peacock 1740-1751: The Worlds of a County Limerick Farmer and Agent. Kelly, J. p. 134 Helen Litton (comp.), An Index to the Rev. William Carrigan's The History and Antiquities of the Diocese of Ossory. Manning, C. p. 135 Kevin McKenny, The Laggan Army in Ireland 1649-1685: The Landed Interests, Political Ideologies and Military Campaigns of the North-West Ulster Settlers. Connolly, S. p. 136 A.P.W. Malcomson, Nathaniel Clements: Government and the Governing Elite in Ireland, 1725-75. McNally, P. p. 137 Kenneth Milne (ed.) A Church of Ireland Bibliography, Raymond Refausse, Church of Ireland Records, Maynooth Research Guides for Irish Local History; Jane V. Spring (ed.), Kilcolman Parish Registers 1793-1814 and 1824-1900, County Kerry, Church of Ireland with Sections from Killorglin, Aglish, Kiltallagh, Knocknane, Molahiffe. MacCarthy, R. pp. 138-139 Vincent Morley, Washington i gCeannas a Riochta: Cogadh Mheiricea i Litriocht na Gaeilge. Buttimer, N. pp. 140-141 Raymond Murray, The Burning of Wildgoose Lodge: Ribbonism in Louth - Murder and the Gallows. Kelly, J. p. 142 Maighread Ni Mhurchadha, Fingal, 1603-60: Contending Neighbours in North Dublin. Stout, G. pp. 143-144 William Nolan (ed. and comp.) with contributions by Jim Wren, Marcus De Burca and David Gorry, The Gaelic Athletic Association inDublin 1884-2000. Cronin, M. pp. 145-146 Mary O'Dowd, A History of Women in Ireland 1500-1800. Gray, J. p. 147 David O'Hara, English Newsbooks and Irish Rebellion, 1641-1649. Siochru, M. O. p. 148 Richard Pine, Music and Broadcasting in Ireland. Flynn, P. pp. 149-150 Michael Potterton, Medieval Trim: History and Archaeology. Hennessy, M. pp. 151-152 Margaret H. Preston, Charitable Words: Women, Philanthropy and the Language of Charity in Nineteenth-Century Dublin, Contributions in Women's Studies no. 202. Prunty, J. p. 153 Ray Rivlin, Shalom Ireland: A Social History of Jews in Modern Ireland. Dochartaigh, P. O. p. 154 Beverly E. Schneller, Anna Parnell's Political Journalism: Contexts and Texts. King, C. p. 155 Charles Townshend, Easter 1916: The Irish Rebellion. McNamara, C. pp. 156-157 Oonagh Walsh, Anglican Women in Dublin: Philanthropy, Politics and Education in the Early Twentieth Century. hOgartaigh, M. O. | |
TOP | |
7358 | 20 February 2007 10:49 |
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:49:20 -0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
David Lloyd and Terence Dolan lectures, Liverpool Hope University | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: Patrick O'Sullivan Subject: David Lloyd and Terence Dolan lectures, Liverpool Hope University MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Forwarded on behalf of Dr Terry Phillips Dean of Arts and Humanities Liverpool Hope University phillim[at]hope.ac.uk +44-0151-291-3126 Fax: +44-0151-291-3160 Lectures at Liverpool Hope University Thursday 22nd February Professor Terence Dolan University College, Dublin will speak on 'The Stigma of Hiberno-English' 1.00 pm in the Alexander Jones Building at the University's Hope Park Campus For details of how to reach Hope Park see www.hope.ac.uk/gettingtohope/hopepark.htm Wednesday 14th March Professor David Lloyd University of Southern California will speak on 'Citizens and the State: Contemporary Issues' 5.00 pm, in the Cornerstone Building at the University's Hope at Everton Campus For details of how to reach Hope at Everton see www.hope.ac.uk/gettingtohope/hopeateverton.htm | |
TOP | |
7359 | 20 February 2007 10:51 |
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:51:53 -0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
TOC EIRE IRELAND VOL 41; NUMB 3/4; 2006 | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: Patrick O'Sullivan Subject: TOC EIRE IRELAND VOL 41; NUMB 3/4; 2006 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Email Patrick O'Sullivan EIRE IRELAND VOL 41; NUMB 3/4; 2006 ISSN 0013-2683 pp. 11-41 The Significance of the Armagh Dirty Protest. Weinstein, L. pp. 42-58 Exorcising the Ghosts of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Stewart Parker's The Iceberg and Pentecost. Russell, R. R. pp. 59-79 "The Only Thing British That Everybody Likes": Military-Civilian Relations in Late Victorian Ulster. Garnham, N. pp. 80-109 Irish Nationalism and Orange Unionism in Canada: A Reappraisal. McLaughlin, R. pp. 110-132 Irish Marxism and the Development of the Theory of Neo-Colonialism. McGuire, C. pp. 133-161 Indigenous Otherness: Some Aspects of Irish Traveller Social History. Hayes, M. pp. 162-184 Paddy Jumps Jim Crow: Irish-Americans and Blackface Minstrelsy. Nowatzki, R. pp. 185-214 Theater and Nation in Irish Romanticism: The Tragic Dramas of Charles Robert Maturin and Richard Lalor Sheil. Connolly, C. pp. 215-244 "Broad Farce and Thrilling Tragedy": Mangan's Fiction and Irish Gothic. Haslam, R. pp. 245-266 Emily Lawless's Maelcho and the Crisis of the Imperial Romance. Maume, P. | |
TOP | |
7360 | 20 February 2007 12:10 |
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:10:48 -0000
Reply-To: The Irish Diaspora Studies List | |
Article, Mitchell, The religious content of ethnic identities | |
Sender: The Irish Diaspora Studies List
From: Patrick O'Sullivan Subject: Article, Mitchell, The religious content of ethnic identities MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Email Patrick O'Sullivan This is a very brave attempt by Claire Mitchell to engage with the literature, broadly within historical sociology, on religion and identity - as that literature is used, or not used, in studies of Northern Ireland. Note that this is a SAGE journal, currently freely available on the SAGE web site. But be quick... P.O'S. Title: The religious content of ethnic identities Author(s): Mitchell C (Mitchell, Claire) Source: SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION 40 (6): 1135-1152 DEC 2006 Document Type: Article Language: English Information Abstract: The religious dimensions of ethnic identities have been under-theorized. In contemporary industrial societies there is a tendency to characterize religiously demarcated groups as 'really' ethnic. This article suggests that the religious content of ethnic boundaries may be more important than might initially be assumed, A religious identification may have specific religious content and assumptions that may cause it to operate in different ways from other identities. Even if identities do not seem primarily religious per se, they may have latent religious dimensions that can become reactivated. Whilst identity conflicts and other social struggles may stimulate the return of the religious, once reactivated, the religious dimensions of identity may take on a logic of their own. Therefore, the article argues that in many contexts there is a two-way relationship between religion and ethnicity. Each can stimulate the other, rather than religion simply playing a supporting role to the ethnic centrepiece. Author Keywords: community; ethnicity; identity; nationalism; religion KeyWords Plus: NORTHERN-IRELAND; SYMBOLIC ETHNICITY; MODERN BRITAIN; CONSTRUCTION; CONFLICT; BOUNDARY; BEHAVIOR Addresses: Mitchell C (reprint author), Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Sociol Social Policy & Social Work, 6 Coll Pk E, Belfast BT7 1LP, Antrim North Ireland Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Sociol Social Policy & Social Work, Belfast BT7 1LP, Antrim North Ireland E-mail Addresses: Claire.Mitchell[at]qub.ac.uk Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND Subject Category: Sociology IDS Number: 126BB ISSN: 0038-0385 | |
TOP |